NIOG vs. JETU
NIOG (Leverage Shares 2X Long NIO Daily ETF) and JETU (MAX Airlines 3X Leveraged ETN) are both Leveraged Equities funds - NIOG tracks the NIO Inc. (NIO) while JETU tracks the Prime Airlines Index - Benchmark TR Net. Both are passively managed. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NIOG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for JETU.
Performance
NIOG vs. JETU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NIOG achieves a -19.49% return, which is significantly lower than JETU's 22.30% return.
NIOG
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- -7.97%
- YTD
- -19.49%
- 6M
- -13.35%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JETU
- 1D
- -0.86%
- 1M
- 26.77%
- YTD
- 22.30%
- 6M
- 17.30%
- 1Y
- 88.26%
- 3Y*
- 14.54%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NIOG vs. JETU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NIOG Leverage Shares 2X Long NIO Daily ETF | -19.49% | 3.25% |
JETU MAX Airlines 3X Leveraged ETN | 22.30% | 2.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between NIOG and JETU is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2025 | 0.13 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NIOG vs. JETU — Risk / Return Rank
NIOG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
JETU
NIOG vs. JETU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long NIO Daily ETF (NIOG) and MAX Airlines 3X Leveraged ETN (JETU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NIOG | JETU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.23 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.80 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 4.40 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NIOG vs. JETU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NIOG drawdown since its inception was -50.60%, smaller than the maximum JETU drawdown of -68.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NIOG and JETU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NIOG | JETU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.60% | -68.64% | +18.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -49.39% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -68.64% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -49.56% | -12.41% | -37.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.25% | -29.32% | +7.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 20.12% | — |
Volatility
NIOG vs. JETU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NIOG | JETU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 29.26% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 61.58% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 115.70% | 75.98% | +39.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 115.70% | 71.53% | +44.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 115.70% | 71.53% | +44.17% |
NIOG vs. JETU - Expense Ratio Comparison
NIOG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than JETU's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
NIOG vs. JETU - Dividend Comparison
Neither NIOG nor JETU has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
NIOG and JETU have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NIOG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NIOG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for JETU.
NIOG and JETU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
NIOG tracks NIO Inc. (NIO), while JETU tracks Prime Airlines Index - Benchmark TR Net. They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Max. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for NIOG and 0.95% for JETU.
Find the right allocation for NIOG and JETU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer