NIOG vs. JETU
NIOG (Leverage Shares 2X Long NIO Daily ETF) and JETU (MAX Airlines 3X Leveraged ETN) are both Leveraged Equities funds - NIOG tracks the NIO Inc. (NIO) while JETU tracks the Prime Airlines Index - Benchmark TR Net. Both are passively managed. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NIOG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for JETU.
Performance
NIOG vs. JETU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NIOG achieves a -22.74% return, which is significantly lower than JETU's 18.81% return.
NIOG
- 1D
- 3.78%
- 1M
- -8.94%
- 6M
- -8.40%
- YTD
- -22.74%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JETU
- 1D
- -1.85%
- 1M
- 5.33%
- 6M
- 3.35%
- YTD
- 18.81%
- 1Y
- 42.73%
- 3Y*
- 8.20%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NIOG vs. JETU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NIOG Leverage Shares 2X Long NIO Daily ETF | -22.74% | 3.25% |
JETU MAX Airlines 3X Leveraged ETN | 18.81% | 2.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between NIOG and JETU is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2025 | 0.07 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NIOG vs. JETU — Risk / Return Rank
NIOG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
JETU
NIOG vs. JETU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long NIO Daily ETF (NIOG) and MAX Airlines 3X Leveraged ETN (JETU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NIOG | JETU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.15 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.87 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 2.12 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NIOG vs. JETU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NIOG drawdown since its inception was -56.27%, smaller than the maximum JETU drawdown of -68.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NIOG and JETU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NIOG | JETU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.27% | -68.64% | +12.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -49.39% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -68.64% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -51.59% | -16.40% | -35.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.36% | -28.89% | +3.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 20.20% | — |
Volatility
NIOG vs. JETU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NIOG | JETU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 17.17% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 62.17% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 113.02% | 75.17% | +37.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 113.02% | 71.37% | +41.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 113.02% | 71.37% | +41.65% |
NIOG vs. JETU - Expense Ratio Comparison
NIOG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than JETU's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
NIOG vs. JETU - Dividend Comparison
Neither NIOG nor JETU has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
NIOG and JETU have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NIOG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NIOG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for JETU.
NIOG and JETU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
NIOG tracks NIO Inc. (NIO), while JETU tracks Prime Airlines Index - Benchmark TR Net. They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Max. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for NIOG and 0.95% for JETU.
Find the right allocation for NIOG and JETU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer