PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
NIHI vs. ENFR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

NIHI vs. ENFR

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

NIHI (NEOS MSCI EAFE High Income ETF) and ENFR (Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NIHI is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Neos, while ENFR is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index. NIHI is actively managed, while ENFR is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.09, they often move in opposite directions. NIHI charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for ENFR.

Performance

NIHI vs. ENFR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEOS MSCI EAFE High Income ETF (NIHI) and Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NIHI achieves a 5.71% return, which is significantly lower than ENFR's 24.93% return.

NIHI

1D
-1.57%
1M
0.15%
YTD
5.71%
6M
5.67%
1Y
—
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—

ENFR

1D
1.51%
1M
-4.52%
YTD
24.93%
6M
25.03%
1Y
27.76%
3Y*
28.90%
5Y*
20.07%
10Y*
11.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NIHI vs. ENFR - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025
NIHI
NEOS MSCI EAFE High Income ETF		5.71%4.89%
ENFR
Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF		24.93%-0.24%

Correlation

The correlation between NIHI and ENFR is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2025

-0.09

NIHI vs. ENFR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
NIHI
ENFR

Financial Services

22.6%
0.1%

Industrials

20.3%
3.4%

Technology

11.3%

-

Healthcare

9.6%

-

Consumer Cyclical

8.3%

-

Basic Materials

6.8%

-

Consumer Defensive

6.3%

-

Communication Services

4.7%

-

Energy

3.7%
98.5%

Utilities

3.6%
1.4%

Real Estate

3.0%

-

Financial Services

NIHI
22.6%
ENFR
0.1%

Industrials

NIHI
20.3%
ENFR
3.4%

Technology

NIHI
11.3%
ENFR

-

Healthcare

NIHI
9.6%
ENFR

-

Consumer Cyclical

NIHI
8.3%
ENFR

-

Basic Materials

NIHI
6.8%
ENFR

-

Consumer Defensive

NIHI
6.3%
ENFR

-

Communication Services

NIHI
4.7%
ENFR

-

Energy

NIHI
3.7%
ENFR
98.5%

Utilities

NIHI
3.6%
ENFR
1.4%

Real Estate

NIHI
3.0%
ENFR

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

NEOS MSCI EAFE High Income ETF

Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF

Often compared with NIHI:
NIHI vs. IDVONIHI vs. SPYINIHI vs. QQQINIHI vs. EFASNIHI vs. GIAXNIHI vs. LVHINIHI vs. QQQH
Often compared with ENFR:
ENFR vs. AMLPENFR vs. MLPXENFR vs. TPYPENFR vs. UMIENFR vs. EMLPENFR vs. MPLXENFR vs. ATMP

Return for Risk

NIHI vs. ENFR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
NIHI

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ENFR
ENFR Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
ENFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ENFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
ENFR Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
ENFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
ENFR Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NIHI vs. ENFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS MSCI EAFE High Income ETF (NIHI) and Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

NIHIENFRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

—

1.88

—

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

—

2.59

—

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

—

1.32

—

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

—

3.23

—

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

—

8.24

—

NIHI vs. ENFR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NIHI vs. ENFR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NIHI drawdown since its inception was -10.88%, smaller than the maximum ENFR drawdown of -68.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NIHI and ENFR.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

NIHIENFRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.88%

-68.28%

+57.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

—

-8.64%

—

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

—

-15.58%

—

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

—

-20.29%

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-62.64%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.64%

-4.71%

+3.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.29%

-15.94%

+13.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

—

3.38%

—

Volatility

NIHI vs. ENFR - Volatility Comparison

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

NIHIENFRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

—

5.69%

—

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

—

11.60%

—

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.27%

14.86%

+0.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.27%

19.25%

-3.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.27%

24.68%

-9.41%

NIHI vs. ENFR - Expense Ratio Comparison

NIHI has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than ENFR's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

NIHI vs. ENFR - Dividend Comparison

NIHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.72%, more than ENFR's 4.02% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ENFR
Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF		4.02%4.77%4.41%5.48%5.23%7.86%7.57%5.81%3.98%2.98%3.31%3.34%
NIHI
NEOS MSCI EAFE High Income ETF		8.72%3.44%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

NIHI and ENFR have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ENFR is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ENFR is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for NIHI.

NIHI has the higher dividend yield at 8.72%, compared with 4.02% for ENFR.

NIHI is categorized as Derivative Income, while ENFR is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Neos and SS&C. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for NIHI and 0.35% for ENFR.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NIHI and ENFR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer