PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NIHI vs. EFAS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NIHI vs. EFAS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEOS MSCI EAFE High Income ETF (NIHI) and Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NIHI achieves a 5.71% return, which is significantly lower than EFAS's 12.32% return.


NIHI

1D
-1.57%
1M
0.15%
YTD
5.71%
6M
5.67%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

EFAS

1D
-0.28%
1M
-2.81%
YTD
12.32%
6M
12.80%
1Y
26.33%
3Y*
24.76%
5Y*
12.16%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NIHI vs. EFAS - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between NIHI and EFAS is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2025

0.56

NIHI vs. EFAS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
NIHI
EFAS

Financial Services

22.6%
31.0%

Industrials

20.3%
10.4%

Technology

11.3%
0.1%

Healthcare

9.6%
0.1%

Consumer Cyclical

8.3%
1.9%

Basic Materials

6.8%
1.7%

Consumer Defensive

6.3%
8.1%

Communication Services

4.7%
8.6%

Energy

3.7%
13.1%

Utilities

3.6%
13.7%

Real Estate

3.0%
11.4%

Financial Services

NIHI
22.6%
EFAS
31.0%

Industrials

NIHI
20.3%
EFAS
10.4%

Technology

NIHI
11.3%
EFAS
0.1%

Healthcare

NIHI
9.6%
EFAS
0.1%

Consumer Cyclical

NIHI
8.3%
EFAS
1.9%

Basic Materials

NIHI
6.8%
EFAS
1.7%

Consumer Defensive

NIHI
6.3%
EFAS
8.1%

Communication Services

NIHI
4.7%
EFAS
8.6%

Energy

NIHI
3.7%
EFAS
13.1%

Utilities

NIHI
3.6%
EFAS
13.7%

Real Estate

NIHI
3.0%
EFAS
11.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NIHI vs. EFAS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NIHI

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


EFAS
EFAS Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
EFAS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFAS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFAS Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
EFAS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFAS Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NIHI vs. EFAS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS MSCI EAFE High Income ETF (NIHI) and Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NIHIEFASDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.82

NIHI vs. EFAS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NIHI vs. EFAS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NIHI drawdown since its inception was -10.88%, smaller than the maximum EFAS drawdown of -44.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NIHI and EFAS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NIHIEFASDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.88%

-44.38%

+33.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.64%

-3.56%

+1.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.29%

-7.05%

+4.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.06%

Volatility

NIHI vs. EFAS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NIHIEFASDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.27%

10.95%

+4.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.27%

15.59%

-0.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.27%

18.31%

-3.04%

NIHI vs. EFAS - Expense Ratio Comparison

NIHI has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than EFAS's 0.56% expense ratio.


Dividends

NIHI vs. EFAS - Dividend Comparison

NIHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.72%, more than EFAS's 4.75% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
EFAS
Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF
4.75%4.83%6.76%6.33%7.28%5.19%4.34%5.75%6.63%6.15%0.21%
NIHI
NEOS MSCI EAFE High Income ETF
8.72%3.44%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


NIHI and EFAS have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EFAS is cheaper at 0.56% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EFAS is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for NIHI.

NIHI has the higher dividend yield at 8.72%, compared with 4.75% for EFAS.

NIHI is categorized as Derivative Income, while EFAS is Foreign Large Cap Equities. They also come from different issuers: Neos and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for NIHI and 0.56% for EFAS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NIHI and EFAS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer