NICE vs. FVRR
NICE (NICE Ltd.) and FVRR (Fiverr International Ltd.) are both stocks. NICE operates in Software - Application (Technology), while FVRR operates in Internet Content & Information (Communication Services). Over the past 5 years, NICE returned -17.19%/yr vs -46.02%/yr for FVRR. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
NICE vs. FVRR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NICE achieves a -11.77% return, which is significantly higher than FVRR's -44.13% return.
NICE
- 1D
- 1.92%
- 1M
- 13.24%
- 6M
- -14.80%
- YTD
- -11.77%
- 1Y
- -35.59%
- 3Y*
- -21.22%
- 5Y*
- -17.19%
- 10Y*
- 4.49%
FVRR
- 1D
- 1.10%
- 1M
- 11.97%
- 6M
- -39.14%
- YTD
- -44.13%
- 1Y
- -59.46%
- 3Y*
- -26.20%
- 5Y*
- -46.02%
- 10Y*
- —
NICE vs. FVRR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NICE NICE Ltd. | -11.77% | -33.44% | -14.87% | 3.75% | -36.66% | 7.07% | 82.75% | 11.25% |
FVRR Fiverr International Ltd. | -44.13% | -37.72% | 16.57% | -6.59% | -74.37% | -41.72% | 730.21% | -9.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between NICE and FVRR is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2019 | 0.44 |
Fundamentals
NICE:
$5.84B
FVRR:
$396.90M
NICE:
$8.52
FVRR:
$0.78
NICE:
11.70
FVRR:
14.15
NICE:
0.35
FVRR:
0.07
NICE:
2.06
FVRR:
0.95
NICE:
1.64
FVRR:
0.96
NICE:
$3.01B
FVRR:
$429.22M
NICE:
$1.98B
FVRR:
$348.84M
NICE:
$841.27M
FVRR:
$33.15M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NICE vs. FVRR — Risk / Return Rank
NICE
FVRR
NICE vs. FVRR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NICE Ltd. (NICE) and Fiverr International Ltd. (FVRR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NICE | FVRR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 0.76 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.76 | -0.93 | +0.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.20 | -1.41 | +0.22 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NICE vs. FVRR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NICE drawdown since its inception was -93.23%, roughly equal to the maximum FVRR drawdown of -97.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NICE and FVRR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NICE | FVRR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.23% | -97.02% | +3.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -51.19% | -64.67% | +13.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -68.21% | -72.86% | +4.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -73.60% | -96.28% | +22.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -73.60% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -68.34% | -96.58% | +28.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.27% | -67.97% | +32.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 32.47% | 42.89% | -10.42% |
Volatility
NICE vs. FVRR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for NICE Ltd. (NICE) is 10.16%, while Fiverr International Ltd. (FVRR) has a volatility of 18.08%. This indicates that NICE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FVRR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NICE | FVRR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.16% | 18.08% | -7.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 42.52% | 41.53% | +0.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.48% | 50.24% | +1.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.92% | 64.25% | -24.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.27% | 70.88% | -37.61% |
Dividends
NICE vs. FVRR - Dividend Comparison
Neither NICE nor FVRR has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FVRR Fiverr International Ltd. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NICE NICE Ltd. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.14% | 0.76% | 0.91% |
Financials
NICE vs. FVRR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between NICE Ltd. and Fiverr International Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
NICE vs. FVRR - Profitability Comparison
NICE - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, NICE Ltd. reported a gross profit of 493.46M and revenue of 766.53M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 64.4%.
FVRR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Fiverr International Ltd. reported a gross profit of 85.83M and revenue of 105.49M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 81.4%.
NICE - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, NICE Ltd. reported an operating income of 126.41M and revenue of 766.53M, resulting in an operating margin of 16.5%.
FVRR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Fiverr International Ltd. reported an operating income of 8.50M and revenue of 105.49M, resulting in an operating margin of 8.1%.
NICE - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, NICE Ltd. reported a net income of 46.69M and revenue of 766.53M, resulting in a net margin of 6.1%.
FVRR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Fiverr International Ltd. reported a net income of 8.56M and revenue of 105.49M, resulting in a net margin of 8.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
NICE and FVRR have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FVRR has higher volatility (18.08%) compared to NICE (10.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NICE dropped -93.23% vs FVRR's -97.02%.
NICE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.76 vs -1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NICE and FVRR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer