NHTC vs. MED

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

NHTC (Natural Health Trends Corp.) and MED (Medifast, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Cyclical sector — NHTC in Internet Retail, MED in Personal Services. Over the past 10 years, NHTC returned -12.59%/yr vs -6.93%/yr for MED. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

NHTC vs. MED - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Natural Health Trends Corp. (NHTC) and Medifast, Inc. (MED). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NHTC achieves a -11.42% return, which is significantly lower than MED's 15.73% return. Over the past 10 years, NHTC has underperformed MED with an annualized return of -12.59%, while MED has yielded a comparatively higher -6.93% annualized return.

NHTC

• 1D: -1.90%
• 1M: -15.96%
• YTD: -11.42%
• 6M: -6.26%
• 1Y: -38.97%
• 3Y*: -9.90%
• 5Y*: -7.90%
• 10Y*: -12.59%

MED

• 1D: -2.68%
• 1M: 13.29%
• YTD: 15.73%
• 6M: 12.47%
• 1Y: -7.21%
• 3Y*: -46.42%
• 5Y*: -46.44%
• 10Y*: -6.93%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NHTC vs. MED - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
NHTC Natural Health Trends Corp.	-11.42%	-20.49%	-11.51%	96.17%	-42.12%	50.40%	6.62%	-68.83%	37.37%	-35.39%
MED Medifast, Inc.	15.73%	-39.39%	-73.79%	-38.34%	-42.31%	9.36%	86.18%	-9.73%	82.11%	72.33%

Correlation

The correlation between NHTC and MED is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.09
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.08
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.12
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.14
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 1995	0.05

Fundamentals

Market Cap NHTC : $26.17M MED : $136.03M
EPS NHTC : -$0.10 MED : -$1.82
PS Ratio NHTC : 0.75 MED : 0.39
PB Ratio NHTC : 1.59 MED : 0.69
Total Revenue (TTM) NHTC : $38.25M MED : $346.10M
Gross Profit (TTM) NHTC : $28.25M MED : $242.70M
EBITDA (TTM) NHTC : -$1.45M MED : -$3.86M

Return for Risk

NHTC vs. MED — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NHTC

NHTC Risk / Return Rank: 13
NHTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
NHTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
NHTC Omega Ratio Rank: 17
NHTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
NHTC Martin Ratio Rank: 3

MED

MED Risk / Return Rank: 31
MED Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
MED Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
MED Omega Ratio Rank: 31
MED Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
MED Martin Ratio Rank: 30

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NHTC vs. MED - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Natural Health Trends Corp. (NHTC) and Medifast, Inc. (MED). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NHTC	MED	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.58	-0.17	-0.41
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.54	0.05	-0.59
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.92	1.01	-0.09
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.79	-0.33	-0.47
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.60	-0.56	-1.04
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NHTC vs. MED - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NHTC Sharpe Ratio is -0.58, which is lower than the MED Sharpe Ratio of -0.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NHTC and MED, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NHTC	MED	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.58	-0.17	-0.41
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.17	-1.03	+0.86
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.25	-0.15	-0.10
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.12	0.03	-0.15

Drawdowns

NHTC vs. MED - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NHTC drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, roughly equal to the maximum MED drawdown of -98.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NHTC and MED.

Drawdown Indicators

	NHTC	MED	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-100.00%	-98.40%	-1.60%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-47.27%	-37.39%	-9.88%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-58.85%	-90.91%	+32.06%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-58.85%	-96.56%	+37.71%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-89.71%	-96.76%	+7.05%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.97%	-95.80%	-4.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-95.82%	-50.80%	-45.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	23.40%	21.54%	+1.86%

Volatility

NHTC vs. MED - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Natural Health Trends Corp. (NHTC) is 12.18%, while Medifast, Inc. (MED) has a volatility of 22.74%. This indicates that NHTC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MED based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NHTC	MED	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.18%	22.74%	-10.56%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	35.52%	32.19%	+3.33%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	67.38%	43.34%	+24.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	46.34%	45.29%	+1.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	50.83%	47.69%	+3.14%

Dividends

NHTC vs. MED - Dividend Comparison

NHTC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 23.26%, while MED has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MED Medifast, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	7.36%	5.69%	2.71%	2.30%	3.08%	1.75%	2.06%	2.57%	0.82%
NHTC Natural Health Trends Corp.	23.26%	25.89%	17.32%	13.65%	23.32%	11.83%	16.06%	10.41%	13.63%	9.02%	2.45%	0.42%

Financials

NHTC vs. MED - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Natural Health Trends Corp. and Medifast, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

NHTC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Natural Health Trends Corp. reported a gross profit of 6.90M and revenue of 9.21M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 75.0%.

MED - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Medifast, Inc. reported a gross profit of 51.76M and revenue of 76.04M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 68.1%.

NHTC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Natural Health Trends Corp. reported an operating income of -474.00K and revenue of 9.21M, resulting in an operating margin of -5.2%.

MED - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Medifast, Inc. reported an operating income of -3.30M and revenue of 76.04M, resulting in an operating margin of -4.3%.

NHTC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Natural Health Trends Corp. reported a net income of -154.00K and revenue of 9.21M, resulting in a net margin of -1.7%.

MED - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Medifast, Inc. reported a net income of -2.12M and revenue of 76.04M, resulting in a net margin of -2.8%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NHTC and MED in my portfolio?

NHTC and MED have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NHTC or MED?

MED has higher volatility (22.74%) compared to NHTC (12.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NHTC dropped -100.00% vs MED's -98.40%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MED currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.17 vs -0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.