PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NHTC vs. BIZD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NHTC vs. BIZD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Natural Health Trends Corp. (NHTC) and VanEck BDC Income ETF (BIZD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NHTC achieves a -43.00% return, which is significantly lower than BIZD's -9.87% return. Over the past 10 years, NHTC has underperformed BIZD with an annualized return of -15.33%, while BIZD has yielded a comparatively higher 7.56% annualized return.


NHTC

1D
-0.60%
1M
-41.34%
YTD
-43.00%
6M
-44.53%
1Y
-56.20%
3Y*
-21.12%
5Y*
-14.47%
10Y*
-15.33%

BIZD

1D
0.65%
1M
-0.65%
YTD
-9.87%
6M
-8.40%
1Y
-12.75%
3Y*
5.35%
5Y*
3.92%
10Y*
7.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NHTC vs. BIZD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NHTC
Natural Health Trends Corp.
-43.00%-20.49%-11.51%96.17%-42.12%50.40%6.62%-68.83%37.37%-35.39%
BIZD
VanEck BDC Income ETF
-9.87%-4.96%15.63%27.02%-8.51%36.25%-7.12%30.87%-6.88%0.36%

Correlation

The correlation between NHTC and BIZD is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2013

0.17

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NHTC vs. BIZD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NHTC
NHTC Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
NHTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NHTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
NHTC Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
NHTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
NHTC Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

BIZD
BIZD Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
BIZD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIZD Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIZD Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
BIZD Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIZD Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NHTC vs. BIZD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Natural Health Trends Corp. (NHTC) and VanEck BDC Income ETF (BIZD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NHTCBIZDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.84

0.90

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.92

-0.58

-0.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-2.15

-0.96

-1.19

NHTC vs. BIZD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NHTC Sharpe Ratio is -0.80, which is comparable to the BIZD Sharpe Ratio of -0.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NHTC and BIZD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NHTC vs. BIZD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NHTC drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than BIZD's maximum drawdown of -55.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NHTC and BIZD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NHTCBIZDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-100.00%

-55.44%

-44.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-61.13%

-22.22%

-38.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-69.67%

-22.56%

-47.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-69.67%

-22.91%

-46.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-89.71%

-55.44%

-34.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.98%

-20.05%

-79.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-95.81%

-6.76%

-89.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

26.13%

13.30%

+12.83%

Volatility

NHTC vs. BIZD - Volatility Comparison

Natural Health Trends Corp. (NHTC) has a higher volatility of 21.76% compared to VanEck BDC Income ETF (BIZD) at 5.60%. This indicates that NHTC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIZD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NHTCBIZDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

21.76%

5.60%

+16.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

39.97%

15.19%

+24.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

70.36%

18.50%

+51.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

47.19%

17.44%

+29.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

51.18%

21.78%

+29.40%

Dividends

NHTC vs. BIZD - Dividend Comparison

NHTC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 36.14%, more than BIZD's 14.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BIZD
VanEck BDC Income ETF
14.01%11.78%10.94%10.96%11.21%8.14%10.39%9.13%10.88%9.13%8.51%9.12%
NHTC
Natural Health Trends Corp.
36.14%25.89%17.32%13.65%23.32%11.83%16.06%10.41%13.63%9.02%2.45%0.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


NHTC and BIZD have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NHTC has higher volatility (21.76%) compared to BIZD (5.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NHTC dropped -100.00% vs BIZD's -55.44%.

BIZD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.69 vs -0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NHTC and BIZD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer