NHTC vs. BIZD

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

NHTC (Natural Health Trends Corp.) is a stock, while BIZD (VanEck BDC Income ETF) is Financials Equities fund tracking the MVIS US Business Development Companies Index. Over the past 10 years, NHTC returned -13.22%/yr vs 7.77%/yr for BIZD. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

NHTC vs. BIZD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Natural Health Trends Corp. (NHTC) and VanEck BDC Income ETF (BIZD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NHTC achieves a -17.60% return, which is significantly lower than BIZD's -8.99% return. Over the past 10 years, NHTC has underperformed BIZD with an annualized return of -13.22%, while BIZD has yielded a comparatively higher 7.77% annualized return.

NHTC

• 1D: -6.98%
• 1M: -20.32%
• YTD: -17.60%
• 6M: -8.74%
• 1Y: -41.69%
• 3Y*: -12.04%
• 5Y*: -9.20%
• 10Y*: -13.22%

BIZD

• 1D: -2.28%
• 1M: -6.62%
• YTD: -8.99%
• 6M: -10.20%
• 1Y: -12.94%
• 3Y*: 5.27%
• 5Y*: 4.03%
• 10Y*: 7.77%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NHTC vs. BIZD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
NHTC Natural Health Trends Corp.	-17.60%	-20.49%	-11.51%	96.17%	-42.12%	50.40%	6.62%	-68.83%	37.37%	-35.39%
BIZD VanEck BDC Income ETF	-8.99%	-4.96%	15.63%	27.02%	-8.51%	36.25%	-7.12%	30.87%	-6.88%	0.36%

Correlation

The correlation between NHTC and BIZD is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.15
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.10
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.19
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.20
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2013	0.17

Return for Risk

NHTC vs. BIZD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NHTC

NHTC Risk / Return Rank: 11
NHTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
NHTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
NHTC Omega Ratio Rank: 15
NHTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
NHTC Martin Ratio Rank: 2

BIZD

BIZD Risk / Return Rank: 3
BIZD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
BIZD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
BIZD Omega Ratio Rank: 3
BIZD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
BIZD Martin Ratio Rank: 4

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NHTC vs. BIZD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Natural Health Trends Corp. (NHTC) and VanEck BDC Income ETF (BIZD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NHTC	BIZD	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.62	-0.72	+0.10
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.62	-0.93	+0.31
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.91	0.90	+0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.88	-0.58	-0.30
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.78	-1.03	-0.75
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NHTC vs. BIZD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NHTC Sharpe Ratio is -0.62, which is comparable to the BIZD Sharpe Ratio of -0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NHTC and BIZD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NHTC	BIZD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.62	-0.72	+0.10
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.20	0.23	-0.43
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.26	0.36	-0.62
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.12	0.30	-0.42

Drawdowns

NHTC vs. BIZD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NHTC drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than BIZD's maximum drawdown of -55.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NHTC and BIZD.

Drawdown Indicators

	NHTC	BIZD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-100.00%	-55.44%	-44.56%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-47.27%	-22.22%	-25.05%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-58.85%	-22.56%	-36.29%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-58.85%	-22.91%	-35.94%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-89.71%	-55.44%	-34.27%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.97%	-19.27%	-80.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-95.82%	-6.72%	-89.10%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	23.48%	12.63%	+10.85%

Volatility

NHTC vs. BIZD - Volatility Comparison

Natural Health Trends Corp. (NHTC) has a higher volatility of 13.74% compared to VanEck BDC Income ETF (BIZD) at 4.79%. This indicates that NHTC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIZD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NHTC	BIZD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.74%	4.79%	+8.95%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	36.22%	14.77%	+21.45%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	67.68%	18.11%	+49.57%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	46.41%	17.40%	+29.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	50.87%	21.74%	+29.13%

Dividends

NHTC vs. BIZD - Dividend Comparison

NHTC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 25.00%, more than BIZD's 13.87% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BIZD VanEck BDC Income ETF	13.87%	11.78%	10.94%	10.96%	11.21%	8.14%	10.39%	9.13%	10.88%	9.13%	8.51%	9.12%
NHTC Natural Health Trends Corp.	25.00%	25.89%	17.32%	13.65%	23.32%	11.83%	16.06%	10.41%	13.63%	9.02%	2.45%	0.42%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NHTC and BIZD in my portfolio?

NHTC and BIZD have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NHTC or BIZD?

NHTC has higher volatility (13.74%) compared to BIZD (4.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NHTC dropped -100.00% vs BIZD's -55.44%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NHTC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.62 vs -0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.