PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NHTC vs. SCHD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NHTC vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Natural Health Trends Corp. (NHTC) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NHTC achieves a -11.42% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 19.01% return. Over the past 10 years, NHTC has underperformed SCHD with an annualized return of -12.59%, while SCHD has yielded a comparatively higher 12.77% annualized return.


NHTC

1D
-1.90%
1M
-15.96%
YTD
-11.42%
6M
-6.26%
1Y
-38.97%
3Y*
-9.90%
5Y*
-7.90%
10Y*
-12.59%

SCHD

1D
0.59%
1M
1.60%
YTD
19.01%
6M
20.36%
1Y
28.08%
3Y*
15.09%
5Y*
8.49%
10Y*
12.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NHTC vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NHTC
Natural Health Trends Corp.
-11.42%-20.49%-11.51%96.17%-42.12%50.40%6.62%-68.83%37.37%-35.39%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
19.01%4.34%11.66%4.54%-3.26%29.87%15.03%27.29%-5.56%20.85%

Correlation

The correlation between NHTC and SCHD is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2011

0.16

The correlation between NHTC and SCHD shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (1 year) to 0.18 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NHTC vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NHTC
NHTC Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
NHTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NHTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
NHTC Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
NHTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
NHTC Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHD
SCHD Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
SCHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHD Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHD Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NHTC vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Natural Health Trends Corp. (NHTC) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NHTCSCHDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.58

2.57

-3.16

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.54

3.98

-4.52

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.92

1.46

-0.54

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.79

6.17

-6.96

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.60

15.20

-16.80

NHTC vs. SCHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NHTC Sharpe Ratio is -0.58, which is lower than the SCHD Sharpe Ratio of 2.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NHTC and SCHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NHTCSCHDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.58

2.57

-3.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.17

0.59

-0.77

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.25

0.77

-1.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.12

0.86

-0.98

Drawdowns

NHTC vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NHTC drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NHTC and SCHD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NHTCSCHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-100.00%

-33.37%

-66.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-47.27%

-4.61%

-42.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-58.85%

-16.13%

-42.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-58.85%

-16.85%

-42.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-89.71%

-33.37%

-56.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.97%

-1.40%

-98.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-95.82%

-3.32%

-92.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

23.40%

1.87%

+21.53%

Volatility

NHTC vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison

Natural Health Trends Corp. (NHTC) has a higher volatility of 12.18% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 2.92%. This indicates that NHTC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NHTCSCHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.18%

2.92%

+9.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.52%

7.66%

+27.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

67.38%

10.96%

+56.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

46.34%

14.38%

+31.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

50.83%

16.72%

+34.11%

Dividends

NHTC vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison

NHTC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 23.26%, more than SCHD's 3.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NHTC
Natural Health Trends Corp.
23.26%25.89%17.32%13.65%23.32%11.83%16.06%10.41%13.63%9.02%2.45%0.42%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
3.26%3.82%3.64%3.49%3.39%2.78%3.16%2.98%3.06%2.63%2.89%2.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


NHTC and SCHD have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NHTC has higher volatility (12.18%) compared to SCHD (2.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NHTC dropped -100.00% vs SCHD's -33.37%.

SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs -0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NHTC and SCHD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer