PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NGL vs. MU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NGL vs. MU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NGL Energy Partners LP (NGL) and Micron Technology, Inc. (MU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NGL achieves a 62.80% return, which is significantly lower than MU's 278.41% return. Over the past 10 years, NGL has underperformed MU with an annualized return of 5.97%, while MU has yielded a comparatively higher 56.13% annualized return.


NGL

1D
-1.51%
1M
2.71%
YTD
62.80%
6M
71.91%
1Y
378.82%
3Y*
66.61%
5Y*
45.34%
10Y*
5.97%

MU

1D
1.45%
1M
87.28%
YTD
278.41%
6M
361.42%
1Y
958.34%
3Y*
150.98%
5Y*
67.58%
10Y*
56.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NGL vs. MU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NGL
NGL Energy Partners LP
62.80%100.40%-10.41%360.33%-33.52%-24.17%-75.27%34.05%-22.35%-20.22%
MU
Micron Technology, Inc.
278.41%240.24%-0.96%71.93%-45.93%24.21%39.79%69.49%-22.84%87.59%

Correlation

The correlation between NGL and MU is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 17, 2011

0.18

Fundamentals

EPS

NGL:

$1.24

MU:

$21.26

PE Ratio

NGL:

13.11

MU:

50.79

PEG Ratio

NGL:

0.12

MU:

0.19

PS Ratio

NGL:

0.66

MU:

21.07

Total Revenue (TTM)

NGL:

$3.18B

MU:

$58.12B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NGL:

$755.25M

MU:

$33.96B

EBITDA (TTM)

NGL:

$639.38M

MU:

$25.99B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NGL vs. MU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NGL
NGL Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
NGL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NGL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
NGL Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
NGL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
NGL Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

MU
MU Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
MU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MU Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
MU Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
MU Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
MU Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NGL vs. MU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NGL Energy Partners LP (NGL) and Micron Technology, Inc. (MU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NGLMUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-7.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.85

1.94

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

24.16

31.98

-7.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

60.85

126.47

-65.62

NGL vs. MU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NGL Sharpe Ratio is 7.10, which is lower than the MU Sharpe Ratio of 14.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NGL and MU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NGLMUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.10

14.69

-7.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

1.30

-0.52

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.09

1.13

-1.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.08

0.31

-0.23

Drawdowns

NGL vs. MU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NGL drawdown since its inception was -94.71%, roughly equal to the maximum MU drawdown of -98.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NGL and MU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NGLMUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.71%

-98.25%

+3.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.80%

-30.28%

+14.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-53.72%

-57.63%

+3.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-63.12%

-57.63%

-5.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-92.74%

-57.63%

-35.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.12%

0.00%

-17.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-51.84%

-58.20%

+6.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.26%

7.64%

-1.38%

Volatility

NGL vs. MU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for NGL Energy Partners LP (NGL) is 12.69%, while Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) has a volatility of 28.51%. This indicates that NGL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NGLMUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.69%

28.51%

-15.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.42%

53.48%

-20.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

53.78%

66.00%

-12.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

58.99%

52.31%

+6.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

69.53%

49.66%

+19.87%

Dividends

NGL vs. MU - Dividend Comparison

NGL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MU
Micron Technology, Inc.
0.05%0.16%0.55%0.54%0.89%0.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NGL
NGL Energy Partners LP
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%37.08%13.76%16.27%16.23%8.62%22.78%

Financials

NGL vs. MU - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between NGL Energy Partners LP and Micron Technology, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00BAprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
909.82M
23.86B
(NGL) Total Revenue
(MU) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

NGL vs. MU - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between NGL Energy Partners LP and Micron Technology, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-40.0%-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
21.4%
74.4%
Portfolio components
NGL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NGL Energy Partners LP reported a gross profit of 194.75M and revenue of 909.82M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 21.4%.

MU - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported a gross profit of 17.75B and revenue of 23.86B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.4%.

NGL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NGL Energy Partners LP reported an operating income of 109.14M and revenue of 909.82M, resulting in an operating margin of 12.0%.

MU - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported an operating income of 16.13B and revenue of 23.86B, resulting in an operating margin of 67.6%.

NGL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NGL Energy Partners LP reported a net income of 47.18M and revenue of 909.82M, resulting in a net margin of 5.2%.

MU - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported a net income of 13.79B and revenue of 23.86B, resulting in a net margin of 57.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


NGL and MU have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MU has higher volatility (28.51%) compared to NGL (12.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NGL dropped -94.71% vs MU's -98.25%.

MU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (14.69 vs 7.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NGL and MU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer