NFRX vs. VPU
NFRX (Harrison Street Infrastructure Active ETF) and VPU (Vanguard Utilities ETF) are both Utilities Equities funds. NFRX is actively managed, while VPU is passively managed. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NFRX charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for VPU.
Performance
NFRX vs. VPU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
NFRX
- 1D
- 0.75%
- 1M
- -1.04%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VPU
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- -0.84%
- YTD
- 5.98%
- 6M
- 6.31%
- 1Y
- 14.60%
- 3Y*
- 14.56%
- 5Y*
- 10.18%
- 10Y*
- 9.17%
NFRX vs. VPU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
NFRX Harrison Street Infrastructure Active ETF | 6.79% |
VPU Vanguard Utilities ETF | 4.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between NFRX and VPU is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2026 | 0.77 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NFRX vs. VPU — Risk / Return Rank
NFRX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
VPU
NFRX vs. VPU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harrison Street Infrastructure Active ETF (NFRX) and Vanguard Utilities ETF (VPU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NFRX | VPU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.18 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.65 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 3.51 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NFRX vs. VPU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NFRX drawdown since its inception was -7.26%, smaller than the maximum VPU drawdown of -46.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NFRX and VPU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NFRX | VPU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.26% | -46.31% | +39.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.90% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -17.34% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.15% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.42% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.51% | -4.74% | +1.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.69% | -7.78% | +5.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.16% | — |
Volatility
NFRX vs. VPU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NFRX | VPU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.20% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.54% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.91% | 14.45% | -0.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.91% | 17.03% | -3.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.91% | 19.15% | -5.24% |
NFRX vs. VPU - Expense Ratio Comparison
NFRX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than VPU's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
NFRX vs. VPU - Dividend Comparison
NFRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%, less than VPU's 2.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NFRX Harrison Street Infrastructure Active ETF | 0.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VPU Vanguard Utilities ETF | 2.61% | 2.73% | 3.02% | 3.49% | 2.98% | 2.70% | 3.17% | 2.83% | 3.23% | 3.18% | 3.19% | 3.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NFRX and VPU have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VPU is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VPU is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for NFRX.
VPU has the higher dividend yield at 2.61%, compared with 0.22% for NFRX.
They also come from different issuers: Harrison Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for NFRX and 0.09% for VPU.
Find the right allocation for NFRX and VPU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer