PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NFRX vs. GLIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NFRX vs. GLIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harrison Street Infrastructure Active ETF (NFRX) and Lazard Listed Infrastructure ETF (GLIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


NFRX

1D
-0.52%
1M
-0.90%
6M
7.29%
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

GLIX

1D
-0.46%
1M
-2.25%
6M
8.18%
YTD
11.10%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$123.00K$897.80K$447.88K
$1.29K$1.57K$3.59K

NFRX vs. GLIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between NFRX and GLIX is 0.88, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2026

0.88

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NFRX vs. GLIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harrison Street Infrastructure Active ETF (NFRX) and Lazard Listed Infrastructure ETF (GLIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

NFRX vs. GLIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NFRX vs. GLIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NFRX drawdown since its inception was -7.26%, smaller than the maximum GLIX drawdown of -7.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NFRX and GLIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NFRXGLIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.26%

-7.82%

+0.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.62%

-2.47%

-0.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.46%

-1.92%

-0.54%

Volatility

NFRX vs. GLIX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NFRXGLIXDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.50%

11.87%

+1.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.50%

11.87%

+1.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.50%

11.87%

+1.63%

NFRX vs. GLIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NFRX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than GLIX's 0.96% expense ratio.


Dividends

NFRX vs. GLIX - Dividend Comparison

NFRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, less than GLIX's 2.04% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


NFRX and GLIX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, NFRX is cheaper at 0.80% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

NFRX is cheaper with a 0.80% expense ratio, compared with 0.96% for GLIX.

GLIX has the higher dividend yield at 2.04%, compared with 0.99% for NFRX.

They also come from different issuers: Harrison Street and Lazard. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for NFRX and 0.96% for GLIX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NFRX and GLIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer