GLIX vs. ZAP

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

GLIX (Lazard Listed Infrastructure ETF) and ZAP (Global X U.S. Electrification ETF) are both Utilities Equities funds. GLIX is actively managed, while ZAP is passively managed. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GLIX charges 0.96%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for ZAP.

Performance

GLIX vs. ZAP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lazard Listed Infrastructure ETF (GLIX) and Global X U.S. Electrification ETF (ZAP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLIX achieves a 10.17% return, which is significantly lower than ZAP's 15.80% return.

GLIX

• 1D: 0.79%
• 1M: -0.13%
• YTD: 10.17%
• 6M: 10.14%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ZAP

• 1D: 0.57%
• 1M: -3.43%
• YTD: 15.80%
• 6M: 13.19%
• 1Y: 31.07%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLIX vs. ZAP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GLIX Lazard Listed Infrastructure ETF	10.17%	0.49%
ZAP Global X U.S. Electrification ETF	15.80%	-3.04%

Correlation

The correlation between GLIX and ZAP is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2025	0.52

Return for Risk

GLIX vs. ZAP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZAP

ZAP Risk / Return Rank: 65
ZAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
ZAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
ZAP Omega Ratio Rank: 58
ZAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
ZAP Martin Ratio Rank: 62

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLIX vs. ZAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lazard Listed Infrastructure ETF (GLIX) and Global X U.S. Electrification ETF (ZAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GLIX	ZAP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.07	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.40	1.66	-0.26

Drawdowns

GLIX vs. ZAP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLIX drawdown since its inception was -7.82%, smaller than the maximum ZAP drawdown of -12.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLIX and ZAP.

Drawdown Indicators

	GLIX	ZAP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-7.82%	-12.38%	+4.56%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-7.23%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.04%	-3.57%	+0.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.07%	-2.58%	+0.51%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.83%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GLIX	ZAP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	6.33%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	11.72%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.94%	15.12%	-3.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.94%	16.89%	-4.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.94%	16.89%	-4.95%

GLIX vs. ZAP - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLIX has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is higher than ZAP's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

GLIX vs. ZAP - Dividend Comparison

GLIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.65%, more than ZAP's 1.54% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
GLIX Lazard Listed Infrastructure ETF	1.65%	1.30%	0.00%
ZAP Global X U.S. Electrification ETF	1.54%	1.81%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GLIX and ZAP in my portfolio?

GLIX and ZAP have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, GLIX or ZAP?

On fees, ZAP is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GLIX or ZAP?

ZAP is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.96% for GLIX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GLIX or ZAP?

GLIX has the higher dividend yield at 1.65%, compared with 1.54% for ZAP.

What is the main difference between GLIX and ZAP?

They also come from different issuers: Lazard and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.96% for GLIX and 0.50% for ZAP.