NFRX vs. FUTY
NFRX (Harrison Street Infrastructure Active ETF) and FUTY (Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF) are both Utilities Equities funds. NFRX is actively managed, while FUTY is passively managed. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NFRX charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for FUTY.
Performance
NFRX vs. FUTY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
NFRX
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- 0.91%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FUTY
- 1D
- 0.60%
- 1M
- 2.44%
- 6M
- 7.57%
- YTD
- 7.43%
- 1Y
- 13.16%
- 3Y*
- 14.58%
- 5Y*
- 10.08%
- 10Y*
- 9.03%
NFRX vs. FUTY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
NFRX Harrison Street Infrastructure Active ETF | 9.03% |
FUTY Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF | 5.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between NFRX and FUTY is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2026 | 0.79 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NFRX vs. FUTY — Risk / Return Rank
NFRX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FUTY
NFRX vs. FUTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harrison Street Infrastructure Active ETF (NFRX) and Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF (FUTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NFRX | FUTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.16 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.46 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 3.07 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NFRX vs. FUTY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NFRX drawdown since its inception was -7.26%, smaller than the maximum FUTY drawdown of -36.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NFRX and FUTY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NFRX | FUTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.26% | -36.44% | +29.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.93% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -17.35% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.11% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.44% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.49% | -3.45% | +1.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.60% | -6.02% | +3.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.24% | — |
Volatility
NFRX vs. FUTY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NFRX | FUTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.28% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.66% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.83% | 14.66% | -0.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.83% | 17.09% | -3.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.83% | 19.07% | -5.24% |
NFRX vs. FUTY - Expense Ratio Comparison
NFRX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than FUTY's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
NFRX vs. FUTY - Dividend Comparison
NFRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, less than FUTY's 2.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FUTY Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF | 2.58% | 2.67% | 2.96% | 3.31% | 2.72% | 2.70% | 3.07% | 2.82% | 3.11% | 3.03% | 3.35% | 4.33% |
NFRX Harrison Street Infrastructure Active ETF | 0.98% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NFRX and FUTY have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FUTY is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FUTY is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for NFRX.
FUTY has the higher dividend yield at 2.58%, compared with 0.98% for NFRX.
They also come from different issuers: Harrison Street and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for NFRX and 0.08% for FUTY.
Find the right allocation for NFRX and FUTY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer