PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
NFRA vs. YCS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

NFRA vs. YCS

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

NFRA (FlexShares STOXX Global Broad Infrastructure Index Fund) and YCS (ProShares UltraShort Yen) are both exchange-traded funds - NFRA is a Utilities Equities fund tracking the STOXX Global Broad Infrastructure Index, while YCS is a Leveraged Currency fund tracking the USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, NFRA returned 7.17%/yr vs 12.34%/yr for YCS. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. NFRA charges 0.47%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for YCS.

Performance

NFRA vs. YCS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares STOXX Global Broad Infrastructure Index Fund (NFRA) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NFRA achieves a 8.93% return, which is significantly higher than YCS's 7.17% return. Over the past 10 years, NFRA has underperformed YCS with an annualized return of 7.17%, while YCS has yielded a comparatively higher 12.34% annualized return.

NFRA

1D
-1.08%
1M
0.27%
YTD
8.93%
6M
9.67%
1Y
13.59%
3Y*
12.91%
5Y*
5.56%
10Y*
7.17%

YCS

1D
0.17%
1M
4.42%
YTD
7.17%
6M
10.05%
1Y
32.82%
3Y*
19.84%
5Y*
23.54%
10Y*
12.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NFRA vs. YCS - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NFRA
FlexShares STOXX Global Broad Infrastructure Index Fund		8.93%18.42%4.76%8.96%-10.11%9.61%2.24%26.27%-7.74%15.92%
YCS
ProShares UltraShort Yen		7.17%9.04%35.41%28.70%29.09%22.38%-11.18%3.37%-1.49%-6.57%

Correlation

The correlation between NFRA and YCS is -0.44, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.26

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2013

-0.01

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between NFRA and YCS has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.01 to -0.44, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

FlexShares STOXX Global Broad Infrastructure Index Fund

ProShares UltraShort Yen

Often compared with NFRA:
NFRA vs. IGFNFRA vs. IFRANFRA vs. GIINFRA vs. PAVENFRA vs. ENFRNFRA vs. GRIDNFRA vs. ASET
Often compared with YCS:
YCS vs. YCLYCS vs. JPYUSD=XYCS vs. PFIXYCS vs. TBTYCS vs. UUPYCS vs. BCSFYCS vs. SPY

Return for Risk

NFRA vs. YCS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
NFRA
NFRA Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
NFRA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NFRA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
NFRA Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
NFRA Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
NFRA Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
YCS
YCS Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
YCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
YCS Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
YCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
YCS Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NFRA vs. YCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares STOXX Global Broad Infrastructure Index Fund (NFRA) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

NFRAYCSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.32

1.92

-0.60

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.89

2.44

-0.55

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.35

-0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.87

3.97

-2.10

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.01

12.40

-6.39

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NFRA vs. YCS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NFRA Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is lower than the YCS Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NFRA and YCS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

NFRAYCSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.32

1.92

-0.60

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

1.12

-0.69

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

0.65

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.33

+0.15

Drawdowns

NFRA vs. YCS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NFRA drawdown since its inception was -32.49%, smaller than the maximum YCS drawdown of -49.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NFRA and YCS.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

NFRAYCSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.49%

-49.56%

+17.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.28%

-8.30%

+1.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.15%

-23.05%

+11.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.75%

-27.32%

+4.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.49%

-27.32%

-5.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.15%

0.00%

-2.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.53%

-19.93%

+15.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.27%

2.66%

-0.39%

Volatility

NFRA vs. YCS - Volatility Comparison

FlexShares STOXX Global Broad Infrastructure Index Fund (NFRA) has a higher volatility of 3.35% compared to ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS) at 2.75%. This indicates that NFRA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YCS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

NFRAYCSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.35%

2.75%

+0.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.30%

12.32%

-4.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.37%

17.27%

-6.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.98%

21.10%

-8.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.97%

19.01%

-4.04%

NFRA vs. YCS - Expense Ratio Comparison

NFRA has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than YCS's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

NFRA vs. YCS - Dividend Comparison

NFRA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.54%, while YCS has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NFRA
FlexShares STOXX Global Broad Infrastructure Index Fund		5.54%6.00%3.33%2.57%2.28%2.71%2.22%2.27%3.06%2.81%2.98%2.47%
YCS
ProShares UltraShort Yen		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

NFRA and YCS have a correlation of -0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NFRA has higher volatility (3.35%) compared to YCS (2.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NFRA dropped -32.49% vs YCS's -49.56%.

On 10-year performance, YCS leads with 12.34% vs 7.17% for NFRA. On fees, NFRA is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, YCS has been the lower-risk option at 2.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, YCS has performed better with a 12.34% return vs 7.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NFRA is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for YCS.

NFRA has the higher dividend yield at 5.54%, compared with 0.00% for YCS.

NFRA is categorized as Utilities Equities, while YCS is Leveraged Currency. NFRA tracks STOXX Global Broad Infrastructure Index, while YCS tracks USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%). They also come from different issuers: FlexShares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for NFRA and 1.00% for YCS.

YCS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NFRA and YCS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer