PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NFRA vs. SCHD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NFRA vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares STOXX Global Broad Infrastructure Index Fund (NFRA) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NFRA achieves a 9.54% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 20.66% return. Over the past 10 years, NFRA has underperformed SCHD with an annualized return of 7.41%, while SCHD has yielded a comparatively higher 12.91% annualized return.


NFRA

1D
0.72%
1M
0.76%
YTD
9.54%
6M
10.58%
1Y
14.51%
3Y*
12.83%
5Y*
5.59%
10Y*
7.41%

SCHD

1D
0.89%
1M
3.21%
YTD
20.66%
6M
19.57%
1Y
26.72%
3Y*
14.90%
5Y*
8.75%
10Y*
12.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NFRA vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NFRA
FlexShares STOXX Global Broad Infrastructure Index Fund
9.54%18.42%4.76%8.96%-10.11%9.61%2.24%26.27%-7.74%15.92%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
20.66%4.34%11.66%4.54%-3.26%29.87%15.03%27.29%-5.56%20.85%

Correlation

The correlation between NFRA and SCHD is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2013

0.77

Over the past year, the correlation between NFRA and SCHD has dropped to 0.56 - well below their long-term average of 0.77, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

NFRA vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
NFRA
SCHD

Industrials

27.7%
7.4%

Utilities

24.6%
0.0%

Communication Services

21.1%
6.0%

Energy

11.7%
14.6%

Real Estate

4.8%

-

Healthcare

4.1%
18.4%

Technology

1.7%
19.4%

Financial Services

0.7%
9.1%

Consumer Cyclical

0.2%
6.7%

Consumer Defensive

0.1%
18.5%

Basic Materials

-

1.2%

Industrials

NFRA
27.7%
SCHD
7.4%

Utilities

NFRA
24.6%
SCHD
0.0%

Communication Services

NFRA
21.1%
SCHD
6.0%

Energy

NFRA
11.7%
SCHD
14.6%

Real Estate

NFRA
4.8%
SCHD

-

Healthcare

NFRA
4.1%
SCHD
18.4%

Technology

NFRA
1.7%
SCHD
19.4%

Financial Services

NFRA
0.7%
SCHD
9.1%

Consumer Cyclical

NFRA
0.2%
SCHD
6.7%

Consumer Defensive

NFRA
0.1%
SCHD
18.5%

Basic Materials

NFRA

-

SCHD
1.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NFRA vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NFRA
NFRA Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
NFRA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NFRA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
NFRA Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
NFRA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
NFRA Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHD
SCHD Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
SCHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHD Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHD Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NFRA vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares STOXX Global Broad Infrastructure Index Fund (NFRA) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NFRASCHDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.43

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.89

5.70

-3.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.96

13.97

-8.01

NFRA vs. SCHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NFRA Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is lower than the SCHD Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NFRA and SCHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NFRA vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NFRA drawdown since its inception was -32.49%, roughly equal to the maximum SCHD drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NFRA and SCHD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NFRASCHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.49%

-33.37%

+0.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.28%

-4.61%

-2.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.15%

-16.13%

+4.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.75%

-16.85%

-5.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.49%

-33.37%

+0.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.60%

-0.03%

-1.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.52%

-3.31%

-1.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.32%

1.89%

+0.43%

Volatility

NFRA vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison

FlexShares STOXX Global Broad Infrastructure Index Fund (NFRA) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) have volatilities of 3.19% and 3.05%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NFRASCHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.19%

3.05%

+0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.35%

7.53%

+0.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.44%

10.93%

-0.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.99%

14.38%

-1.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.96%

16.72%

-1.76%

NFRA vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

NFRA has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

NFRA vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison

NFRA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.51%, more than SCHD's 3.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NFRA
FlexShares STOXX Global Broad Infrastructure Index Fund
5.51%6.00%3.33%2.57%2.28%2.71%2.22%2.27%3.06%2.81%2.98%2.47%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
3.22%3.82%3.64%3.49%3.39%2.78%3.16%2.98%3.06%2.63%2.89%2.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


NFRA and SCHD have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NFRA has higher volatility (3.19%) compared to SCHD (3.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NFRA dropped -32.49% vs SCHD's -33.37%.

On 10-year performance, SCHD leads with 12.91% vs 7.41% for NFRA. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SCHD has been the lower-risk option at 3.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SCHD has performed better with a 12.91% return vs 7.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for NFRA.

NFRA has the higher dividend yield at 5.51%, compared with 3.22% for SCHD.

NFRA is categorized as Utilities Equities, while SCHD is Dividend. NFRA tracks STOXX Global Broad Infrastructure Index, while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: FlexShares and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for NFRA and 0.06% for SCHD.

SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NFRA and SCHD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer