NFLX vs. TMF
NFLX (Netflix, Inc.) is a stock, while TMF (Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF) is Leveraged Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index (300%). Over the past 10 years, NFLX returned 23.92%/yr vs -16.87%/yr for TMF. At a correlation of -0.07, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
NFLX vs. TMF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NFLX achieves a -14.31% return, which is significantly lower than TMF's -5.18% return. Over the past 10 years, NFLX has outperformed TMF with an annualized return of 23.92%, while TMF has yielded a comparatively lower -16.87% annualized return.
NFLX
- 1D
- -1.14%
- 1M
- -7.68%
- YTD
- -14.31%
- 6M
- -15.60%
- 1Y
- -33.72%
- 3Y*
- 22.62%
- 5Y*
- 10.45%
- 10Y*
- 23.92%
TMF
- 1D
- -0.93%
- 1M
- 7.62%
- YTD
- -5.18%
- 6M
- -5.04%
- 1Y
- -1.79%
- 3Y*
- -19.82%
- 5Y*
- -31.10%
- 10Y*
- -16.87%
NFLX vs. TMF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NFLX Netflix, Inc. | -14.31% | 5.19% | 83.07% | 65.11% | -51.05% | 11.41% | 67.11% | 20.89% | 39.44% | 55.06% |
TMF Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF | -5.18% | -2.94% | -35.95% | -13.01% | -72.60% | -19.80% | 39.02% | 34.75% | -11.01% | 22.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between NFLX and TMF is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2009 | -0.07 |
The correlation between NFLX and TMF shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (all time) to 0.07 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NFLX vs. TMF — Risk / Return Rank
NFLX
TMF
NFLX vs. TMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) and Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF (TMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NFLX | TMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.85 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.81 | 0.99 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.78 | -0.19 | -0.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.35 | -0.41 | -0.94 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NFLX vs. TMF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NFLX drawdown since its inception was -81.99%, smaller than the maximum TMF drawdown of -92.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NFLX and TMF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NFLX | TMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.99% | -92.89% | +10.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -43.35% | -26.51% | -16.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -43.35% | -56.31% | +12.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -75.95% | -88.81% | +12.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -75.95% | -92.89% | +16.94% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -40.01% | -92.15% | +52.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.91% | -43.70% | +18.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 25.19% | 11.96% | +13.23% |
Volatility
NFLX vs. TMF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) is 5.85%, while Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF (TMF) has a volatility of 8.43%. This indicates that NFLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NFLX | TMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.85% | 8.43% | -2.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.58% | 19.46% | +5.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.05% | 28.49% | +4.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.09% | 46.72% | -3.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.49% | 43.92% | -2.43% |
Dividends
NFLX vs. TMF - Dividend Comparison
NFLX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.11%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NFLX Netflix, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TMF Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF | 4.11% | 4.06% | 4.29% | 2.82% | 1.62% | 0.13% | 2.23% | 0.94% | 1.49% | 0.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NFLX and TMF have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TMF has higher volatility (8.43%) compared to NFLX (5.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NFLX dropped -81.99% vs TMF's -92.89%.
TMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.17 vs -1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NFLX and TMF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer