NFLX.NEO vs. PYPL
NFLX.NEO (Netflix Inc CDR) and PYPL (PayPal Holdings, Inc.) are both stocks. NFLX.NEO operates in Entertainment (Communication Services), while PYPL operates in Credit Services (Financial Services). Over the past 3 years, NFLX.NEO returned 24.74%/yr vs -12.67%/yr for PYPL. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
NFLX.NEO vs. PYPL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
NFLX.NEO is traded in CAD, while PYPL is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the PYPL values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NFLX.NEO achieves a -13.18% return, which is significantly higher than PYPL's -27.71% return.
NFLX.NEO
- 1D
- 0.75%
- 1M
- -6.96%
- YTD
- -13.18%
- 6M
- -18.90%
- 1Y
- -35.80%
- 3Y*
- 24.74%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PYPL
- 1D
- -3.21%
- 1M
- -8.47%
- YTD
- -27.71%
- 6M
- -32.69%
- 1Y
- -41.42%
- 3Y*
- -12.67%
- 5Y*
- -28.81%
- 10Y*
- 1.95%
NFLX.NEO vs. PYPL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NFLX.NEO Netflix Inc CDR | -13.18% | 2.50% | 80.06% | 62.83% | -51.84% | 9.68% |
PYPL PayPal Holdings, Inc. | -27.71% | -34.59% | 50.92% | -15.67% | -59.54% | -31.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between NFLX.NEO and PYPL is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 26, 2021 | 0.40 |
The correlation between NFLX.NEO and PYPL shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (1 year) to 0.40 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
NFLX.NEO:
CA$131.44B
PYPL:
$37.99B
NFLX.NEO:
CA$2.46
PYPL:
$5.31
NFLX.NEO:
12.62
PYPL:
7.78
NFLX.NEO:
3.03
PYPL:
1.17
NFLX.NEO:
5.06
PYPL:
1.90
NFLX.NEO:
CA$43.38B
PYPL:
$33.73B
NFLX.NEO:
CA$20.86B
PYPL:
$15.56B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NFLX.NEO vs. PYPL — Risk / Return Rank
NFLX.NEO
PYPL
NFLX.NEO vs. PYPL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Netflix Inc CDR (NFLX.NEO) and PayPal Holdings, Inc. (PYPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NFLX.NEO | PYPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.80 | 0.80 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.81 | -0.82 | +0.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.41 | -1.50 | +0.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NFLX.NEO | PYPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.08 | -1.07 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.71 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.05 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.16 | 0.02 | +0.13 |
Drawdowns
NFLX.NEO vs. PYPL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NFLX.NEO drawdown since its inception was -76.06%, smaller than the maximum PYPL drawdown of -86.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NFLX.NEO and PYPL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NFLX.NEO | PYPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.06% | -86.24% | +10.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -44.25% | -50.40% | +6.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -44.25% | -59.90% | +15.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -86.24% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -86.24% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -39.95% | -85.02% | +45.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.55% | -34.75% | +5.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 25.49% | 27.65% | -2.16% |
Volatility
NFLX.NEO vs. PYPL - Volatility Comparison
Netflix Inc CDR (NFLX.NEO) and PayPal Holdings, Inc. (PYPL) have volatilities of 6.60% and 6.42%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NFLX.NEO | PYPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.60% | 6.42% | +0.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.44% | 31.85% | -6.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.43% | 38.85% | -5.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.09% | 40.86% | +3.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.09% | 37.74% | +6.35% |
Dividends
NFLX.NEO vs. PYPL - Dividend Comparison
NFLX.NEO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PYPL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
NFLX.NEO Netflix Inc CDR | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PYPL PayPal Holdings, Inc. | 1.02% | 0.24% |
Financials
NFLX.NEO vs. PYPL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Netflix Inc CDR and PayPal Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
NFLX.NEO vs. PYPL - Profitability Comparison
NFLX.NEO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Netflix Inc CDR reported a gross profit of 5.35B and revenue of 11.51B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 46.5%.
PYPL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PayPal Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 3.81B and revenue of 8.35B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 45.6%.
NFLX.NEO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Netflix Inc CDR reported an operating income of 3.25B and revenue of 11.51B, resulting in an operating margin of 28.2%.
PYPL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PayPal Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.49B and revenue of 8.35B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.8%.
NFLX.NEO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Netflix Inc CDR reported a net income of 2.55B and revenue of 11.51B, resulting in a net margin of 22.1%.
PYPL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PayPal Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 1.11B and revenue of 8.35B, resulting in a net margin of 13.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
NFLX.NEO and PYPL have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for NFLX.NEO and PYPL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer