PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NFLX.NEO vs. CSCO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NFLX.NEO vs. CSCO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Netflix Inc CDR (NFLX.NEO) and Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

NFLX.NEO is traded in CAD, while CSCO is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CSCO values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NFLX.NEO achieves a -13.18% return, which is significantly lower than CSCO's 62.13% return.


NFLX.NEO

1D
0.75%
1M
-6.96%
YTD
-13.18%
6M
-18.90%
1Y
-35.80%
3Y*
24.74%
5Y*
10Y*

CSCO

1D
-6.23%
1M
35.70%
YTD
62.13%
6M
59.10%
1Y
96.29%
3Y*
40.26%
5Y*
24.55%
10Y*
20.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NFLX.NEO vs. CSCO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
NFLX.NEO
Netflix Inc CDR
-13.18%2.50%80.06%62.83%-51.84%9.68%
CSCO
Cisco Systems, Inc.
62.13%27.35%31.39%6.89%-16.94%7.95%

Correlation

The correlation between NFLX.NEO and CSCO is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 26, 2021

0.24

The correlation between NFLX.NEO and CSCO shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (1 year) to 0.24 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NFLX.NEO:

CA$131.44B

CSCO:

$484.98B

EPS

NFLX.NEO:

CA$2.46

CSCO:

$3.00

PE Ratio

NFLX.NEO:

12.62

CSCO:

40.58

PS Ratio

NFLX.NEO:

3.03

CSCO:

7.99

PB Ratio

NFLX.NEO:

5.06

CSCO:

9.93

Total Revenue (TTM)

NFLX.NEO:

CA$43.38B

CSCO:

$60.75B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NFLX.NEO:

CA$20.86B

CSCO:

$39.08B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NFLX.NEO vs. CSCO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NFLX.NEO
NFLX.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
NFLX.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NFLX.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
NFLX.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
NFLX.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
NFLX.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

CSCO
CSCO Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
CSCO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSCO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSCO Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
CSCO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSCO Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NFLX.NEO vs. CSCO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Netflix Inc CDR (NFLX.NEO) and Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NFLX.NEOCSCODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-4.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-5.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.80

1.57

-0.77

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.81

7.31

-8.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.41

21.93

-23.34

NFLX.NEO vs. CSCO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NFLX.NEO Sharpe Ratio is -1.08, which is lower than the CSCO Sharpe Ratio of 3.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NFLX.NEO and CSCO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NFLX.NEOCSCODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.08

3.16

-4.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.16

0.64

-0.49

Drawdowns

NFLX.NEO vs. CSCO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NFLX.NEO drawdown since its inception was -76.06%, which is greater than CSCO's maximum drawdown of -50.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NFLX.NEO and CSCO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NFLX.NEOCSCODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.06%

-50.58%

-25.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-44.25%

-13.24%

-31.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-44.25%

-19.04%

-25.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-39.95%

-6.23%

-33.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.55%

-12.44%

-17.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

25.49%

4.41%

+21.08%

Volatility

NFLX.NEO vs. CSCO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Netflix Inc CDR (NFLX.NEO) is 6.60%, while Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) has a volatility of 16.95%. This indicates that NFLX.NEO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CSCO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NFLX.NEOCSCODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.60%

16.95%

-10.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.44%

26.73%

-1.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.43%

30.61%

+2.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.09%

23.86%

+20.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

44.09%

25.00%

+19.09%

Dividends

NFLX.NEO vs. CSCO - Dividend Comparison

NFLX.NEO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CSCO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CSCO
Cisco Systems, Inc.
1.36%2.12%2.69%3.07%3.17%2.32%3.20%2.88%2.95%2.95%3.28%3.02%
NFLX.NEO
Netflix Inc CDR
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

NFLX.NEO vs. CSCO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Netflix Inc CDR and Cisco Systems, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


8.00B10.00B12.00B14.00B16.00B20222023202420252026
11.51B
15.84B
(NFLX.NEO) Total Revenue
(CSCO) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. NFLX.NEO values in CAD, CSCO values in USD

NFLX.NEO vs. CSCO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Netflix Inc CDR and Cisco Systems, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%20222023202420252026
46.5%
63.6%
Portfolio components
NFLX.NEO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Netflix Inc CDR reported a gross profit of 5.35B and revenue of 11.51B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 46.5%.

CSCO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cisco Systems, Inc. reported a gross profit of 10.08B and revenue of 15.84B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 63.6%.

NFLX.NEO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Netflix Inc CDR reported an operating income of 3.25B and revenue of 11.51B, resulting in an operating margin of 28.2%.

CSCO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cisco Systems, Inc. reported an operating income of 3.96B and revenue of 15.84B, resulting in an operating margin of 25.0%.

NFLX.NEO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Netflix Inc CDR reported a net income of 2.55B and revenue of 11.51B, resulting in a net margin of 22.1%.

CSCO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cisco Systems, Inc. reported a net income of 3.37B and revenue of 15.84B, resulting in a net margin of 21.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


NFLX.NEO and CSCO have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NFLX.NEO and CSCO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer