NFLP vs. QYLD
NFLP (Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Netflix ETF) and QYLD (Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NFLP is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Kurv, while QYLD is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2. NFLP is actively managed, while QYLD is passively managed. Over the past year, NFLP returned -37.65% vs 23.93% for QYLD. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NFLP charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for QYLD.
Performance
NFLP vs. QYLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NFLP achieves a -18.61% return, which is significantly lower than QYLD's 7.88% return.
NFLP
- 1D
- -2.43%
- 1M
- -12.31%
- YTD
- -18.61%
- 6M
- -25.81%
- 1Y
- -37.65%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QYLD
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 1.62%
- YTD
- 7.88%
- 6M
- 9.97%
- 1Y
- 23.93%
- 3Y*
- 13.80%
- 5Y*
- 8.43%
- 10Y*
- 9.80%
NFLP vs. QYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
NFLP Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Netflix ETF | -18.61% | -1.54% | 53.24% | 13.96% |
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF | 7.88% | 9.28% | 19.35% | 7.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between NFLP and QYLD is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2023 | 0.39 |
Over the past year, the correlation between NFLP and QYLD has dropped to 0.15 - well below their long-term average of 0.39, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NFLP vs. QYLD — Risk / Return Rank
NFLP
QYLD
NFLP vs. QYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Netflix ETF (NFLP) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NFLP | QYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.79 | 1.63 | -0.84 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.87 | 4.84 | -5.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.54 | 28.36 | -29.90 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NFLP | QYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.13 | 2.80 | -3.93 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.58 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.63 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.59 | -0.11 |
Drawdowns
NFLP vs. QYLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NFLP drawdown since its inception was -43.48%, which is greater than QYLD's maximum drawdown of -24.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NFLP and QYLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NFLP | QYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.48% | -24.75% | -18.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -43.48% | -4.97% | -38.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.61% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -24.75% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -41.92% | -0.06% | -41.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.73% | -3.84% | -5.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.52% | 0.85% | +23.67% |
Volatility
NFLP vs. QYLD - Volatility Comparison
Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Netflix ETF (NFLP) has a higher volatility of 8.15% compared to Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) at 1.85%. This indicates that NFLP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NFLP | QYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.15% | 1.85% | +6.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.72% | 7.12% | +20.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.37% | 8.58% | +24.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.88% | 14.70% | +14.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.88% | 15.49% | +13.39% |
NFLP vs. QYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
NFLP has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than QYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
NFLP vs. QYLD - Dividend Comparison
NFLP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 26.06%, more than QYLD's 11.46% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NFLP Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Netflix ETF | 26.06% | 26.56% | 19.87% | 3.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF | 11.46% | 11.55% | 12.50% | 11.78% | 13.75% | 12.85% | 11.16% | 9.84% | 12.44% | 7.69% | 9.15% | 9.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NFLP and QYLD have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NFLP has higher volatility (8.15%) compared to QYLD (1.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NFLP dropped -43.48% vs QYLD's -24.75%.
On 1-year performance, QYLD leads with 23.93% vs -37.65% for NFLP. On fees, QYLD is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, QYLD has been the lower-risk option at 1.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, QYLD has performed better with a 23.93% return vs -37.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QYLD is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for NFLP.
NFLP has the higher dividend yield at 26.06%, compared with 11.46% for QYLD.
NFLP is categorized as Derivative Income, while QYLD is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Kurv and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for NFLP and 0.60% for QYLD.
QYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs -1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NFLP and QYLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer