PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NEWP vs. CRWV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NEWP vs. CRWV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in New Pacific Metals Corp (NEWP) and CoreWeave, Inc. (CRWV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NEWP achieves a 32.19% return, which is significantly higher than CRWV's 0.22% return.


NEWP

1D
-2.52%
1M
8.41%
6M
38.10%
YTD
32.19%
1Y
224.48%
3Y*
25.45%
5Y*
2.36%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
17.76%

CRWV

1D
-2.88%
1M
-12.20%
6M
-22.99%
YTD
0.22%
1Y
-31.08%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
57.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.96B$1.98B$2.88B
$2.12M$2.27M$4.65M

NEWP vs. CRWV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
NEWP
New Pacific Metals Corp
32.19%178.57%
CRWV
CoreWeave, Inc.
0.22%83.62%

Correlation

The correlation between NEWP and CRWV is 0.26, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2025

0.23

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NEWP:

$853.87M

CRWV:

$39.16B

EPS

NEWP:

-$0.02

CRWV:

-$3.27

PB Ratio

NEWP:

5.34

CRWV:

7.95

Total Revenue (TTM)

NEWP:

$0.00

CRWV:

$6.23B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NEWP:

-$179.32K

CRWV:

$4.32B

EBITDA (TTM)

NEWP:

-$5.58M

CRWV:

$1.89B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NEWP vs. CRWV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NEWP
NEWP Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
NEWP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NEWP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
NEWP Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
NEWP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
NEWP Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

CRWV
CRWV Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
CRWV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRWV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRWV Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
CRWV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRWV Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NEWP vs. CRWV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for New Pacific Metals Corp (NEWP) and CoreWeave, Inc. (CRWV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NEWPCRWVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.00

+0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.49

-0.63

+6.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.20

-1.04

+13.24

NEWP vs. CRWV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NEWP Sharpe Ratio is 2.67, which is higher than the CRWV Sharpe Ratio of -0.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NEWP and CRWV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NEWP vs. CRWV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NEWP drawdown since its inception was -86.64%, which is greater than CRWV's maximum drawdown of -66.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEWP and CRWV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NEWPCRWVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.64%

-66.87%

-19.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-41.19%

-59.11%

+17.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-64.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-78.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-32.24%

-60.91%

+28.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-42.19%

-38.69%

-3.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.49%

35.87%

-17.38%

Volatility

NEWP vs. CRWV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for New Pacific Metals Corp (NEWP) is 21.39%, while CoreWeave, Inc. (CRWV) has a volatility of 31.84%. This indicates that NEWP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CRWV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NEWPCRWVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

21.39%

31.84%

-10.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

62.24%

68.91%

-6.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

84.83%

97.38%

-12.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

75.27%

113.24%

-37.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

73.90%

113.24%

-39.34%

Dividends

NEWP vs. CRWV - Dividend Comparison

Neither NEWP nor CRWV has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

NEWP vs. CRWV - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between New Pacific Metals Corp and CoreWeave, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


NEWP and CRWV have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CRWV has higher volatility (31.84%) compared to NEWP (21.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NEWP dropped -86.64% vs CRWV's -66.87%.

NEWP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.67 vs -0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NEWP and CRWV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer