PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NEWP vs. NVDA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NEWP vs. NVDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in New Pacific Metals Corp (NEWP) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NEWP achieves a 46.15% return, which is significantly higher than NVDA's 19.48% return.


NEWP

1D
2.19%
1M
-8.88%
YTD
46.15%
6M
80.00%
1Y
258.74%
3Y*
28.64%
5Y*
-0.46%
10Y*

NVDA

1D
-0.69%
1M
12.28%
YTD
19.48%
6M
22.81%
1Y
62.23%
3Y*
78.33%
5Y*
67.45%
10Y*
69.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NEWP vs. NVDA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NEWP
New Pacific Metals Corp
46.15%197.46%-38.22%-15.11%-23.47%-53.41%37.47%313.51%-4.31%4.50%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
19.48%38.92%171.25%239.02%-50.26%125.48%122.30%76.94%-30.82%-5.01%

Correlation

The correlation between NEWP and NVDA is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2017

0.13

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NEWP:

$945.27M

NVDA:

$5.43T

EPS

NEWP:

-$0.02

NVDA:

$6.53

PB Ratio

NEWP:

5.90

NVDA:

27.80

Total Revenue (TTM)

NEWP:

$0.00

NVDA:

$253.49B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NEWP:

-$179.32K

NVDA:

$187.95B

EBITDA (TTM)

NEWP:

-$5.58M

NVDA:

$192.76B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NEWP vs. NVDA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NEWP
NEWP Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
NEWP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NEWP Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
NEWP Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
NEWP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
NEWP Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

NVDA
NVDA Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
NVDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDA Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDA Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NEWP vs. NVDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for New Pacific Metals Corp (NEWP) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NEWPNVDADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.14

1.84

+1.30

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.17

2.47

+0.70

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.30

+0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

6.50

3.21

+3.29

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

18.00

7.92

+10.08

NEWP vs. NVDA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NEWP Sharpe Ratio is 3.14, which is higher than the NVDA Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NEWP and NVDA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NEWPNVDADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.14

1.84

+1.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.01

1.31

-1.32

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

0.63

-0.36

Drawdowns

NEWP vs. NVDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NEWP drawdown since its inception was -86.64%, roughly equal to the maximum NVDA drawdown of -89.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEWP and NVDA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NEWPNVDADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.64%

-89.72%

+3.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-41.19%

-20.21%

-20.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-65.60%

-36.88%

-28.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-83.33%

-66.34%

-16.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.09%

-5.48%

-19.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-42.29%

-36.21%

-6.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.87%

8.20%

+6.67%

Volatility

NEWP vs. NVDA - Volatility Comparison

New Pacific Metals Corp (NEWP) has a higher volatility of 20.32% compared to NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) at 11.79%. This indicates that NEWP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NVDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NEWPNVDADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

20.32%

11.79%

+8.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

61.61%

25.29%

+36.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

83.02%

34.03%

+48.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

75.04%

51.66%

+23.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

73.79%

49.80%

+23.99%

Dividends

NEWP vs. NVDA - Dividend Comparison

NEWP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NEWP
New Pacific Metals Corp
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
0.02%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.11%0.05%0.12%0.27%0.46%0.29%0.45%1.20%

Financials

NEWP vs. NVDA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between New Pacific Metals Corp and NVIDIA Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B202220232024202520260
81.62B
(NEWP) Total Revenue
(NVDA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


NEWP and NVDA have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NEWP has higher volatility (20.32%) compared to NVDA (11.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NEWP dropped -86.64% vs NVDA's -89.72%.

NEWP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.14 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NEWP and NVDA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer