PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NETL vs. THNQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

NETL vs. THNQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF (NETL) and ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (THNQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

NETL vs. THNQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
NETL
NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF
5.36%6.05%-1.08%2.69%-16.16%27.36%37.30%
THNQ
ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF
-7.05%29.83%18.82%56.81%-39.84%9.10%58.41%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NETL achieves a 5.36% return, which is significantly higher than THNQ's -7.05% return.


NETL

1D
0.63%
1M
-7.51%
YTD
5.36%
6M
2.83%
1Y
3.68%
3Y*
4.52%
5Y*
2.35%
10Y*

THNQ

1D
5.60%
1M
-5.81%
YTD
-7.05%
6M
-7.67%
1Y
33.62%
3Y*
22.10%
5Y*
7.84%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


NETL vs. THNQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

NETL has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than THNQ's 0.68% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

NETL vs. THNQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NETL
NETL Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
NETL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NETL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
NETL Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
NETL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
NETL Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

THNQ
THNQ Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
THNQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
THNQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
THNQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
THNQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
THNQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NETL vs. THNQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF (NETL) and ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (THNQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NETLTHNQDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.23

1.11

-0.88

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.43

1.67

-1.24

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.22

-0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.40

1.74

-1.33

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.43

5.70

-4.27

NETL vs. THNQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NETL Sharpe Ratio is 0.23, which is lower than the THNQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NETL and THNQ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NETLTHNQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

1.11

-0.88

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

0.27

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.17

0.55

-0.37

Correlation

The correlation between NETL and THNQ is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

NETL vs. THNQ - Dividend Comparison

NETL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.98%, more than THNQ's 0.22% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
NETL
NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF
4.98%5.12%5.08%4.57%4.47%4.03%3.98%2.52%
THNQ
ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF
0.22%0.20%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

NETL vs. THNQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NETL drawdown since its inception was -51.48%, roughly equal to the maximum THNQ drawdown of -50.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NETL and THNQ.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


NETLTHNQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.48%

-50.56%

-0.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.76%

-18.39%

+6.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.74%

-50.56%

+19.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.97%

-13.82%

+5.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.89%

-15.44%

+3.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.40%

5.60%

-2.20%

Volatility

NETL vs. THNQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF (NETL) is 4.60%, while ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (THNQ) has a volatility of 10.92%. This indicates that NETL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than THNQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


NETLTHNQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.60%

10.92%

-6.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.78%

20.67%

-10.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.88%

30.44%

-14.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.05%

28.78%

-10.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.16%

28.58%

-2.42%