PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NETL vs. RWX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NETL vs. RWX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF (NETL) and SPDR DJ Wilshire International Real Estate ETF (RWX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NETL achieves a 10.34% return, which is significantly higher than RWX's -3.34% return.


NETL

1D
-1.14%
1M
-1.07%
YTD
10.34%
6M
9.20%
1Y
11.59%
3Y*
7.12%
5Y*
1.33%
10Y*

RWX

1D
-1.01%
1M
-3.50%
YTD
-3.34%
6M
-2.26%
1Y
3.84%
3Y*
5.03%
5Y*
-2.65%
10Y*
0.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NETL vs. RWX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
NETL
NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF
10.34%6.05%-1.08%2.69%-16.16%27.36%-0.73%13.15%
RWX
SPDR DJ Wilshire International Real Estate ETF
-3.34%26.24%-12.15%6.25%-21.84%9.34%-9.03%8.51%

Correlation

The correlation between NETL and RWX is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 2019

0.60

The correlation between NETL and RWX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

NETL vs. RWX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
NETL
RWX

Real Estate

100.0%
60.5%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

3.1%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

1.2%

Financial Services

-

2.8%

Healthcare

-

1.5%

Industrials

-

0.6%

Technology

-

2.7%

Utilities

-

-

Real Estate

NETL
100.0%
RWX
60.5%

Basic Materials

NETL

-

RWX

-

Communication Services

NETL

-

RWX

-

Consumer Cyclical

NETL

-

RWX
3.1%

Consumer Defensive

NETL

-

RWX

-

Energy

NETL

-

RWX
1.2%

Financial Services

NETL

-

RWX
2.8%

Healthcare

NETL

-

RWX
1.5%

Industrials

NETL

-

RWX
0.6%

Technology

NETL

-

RWX
2.7%

Utilities

NETL

-

RWX

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NETL vs. RWX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NETL
NETL Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
NETL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NETL Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
NETL Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
NETL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
NETL Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

RWX
RWX Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
RWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
RWX Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
RWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
RWX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NETL vs. RWX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF (NETL) and SPDR DJ Wilshire International Real Estate ETF (RWX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NETLRWXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.06

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.27

0.28

+0.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.99

0.85

+3.14

NETL vs. RWX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NETL Sharpe Ratio is 0.86, which is higher than the RWX Sharpe Ratio of 0.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NETL and RWX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NETLRWXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

0.29

+0.57

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

-0.17

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.20

0.03

+0.17

Drawdowns

NETL vs. RWX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NETL drawdown since its inception was -51.48%, smaller than the maximum RWX drawdown of -73.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NETL and RWX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NETLRWXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.48%

-73.62%

+22.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.16%

-13.58%

+4.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.30%

-19.05%

-0.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.74%

-35.91%

+5.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.68%

-14.76%

+11.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.65%

-20.30%

+8.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.91%

4.54%

-1.63%

Volatility

NETL vs. RWX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF (NETL) is 3.66%, while SPDR DJ Wilshire International Real Estate ETF (RWX) has a volatility of 4.07%. This indicates that NETL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RWX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NETLRWXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.66%

4.07%

-0.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.66%

10.85%

-1.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.57%

13.26%

+0.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.94%

15.84%

+2.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.92%

16.49%

+9.43%

NETL vs. RWX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NETL has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than RWX's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

NETL vs. RWX - Dividend Comparison

NETL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.83%, more than RWX's 3.78% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NETL
NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF
4.83%5.12%5.08%4.57%4.47%4.03%3.98%2.52%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RWX
SPDR DJ Wilshire International Real Estate ETF
3.78%3.65%4.32%3.90%4.05%4.62%2.92%8.94%5.28%2.77%8.74%2.94%

Frequently Asked Questions


NETL and RWX have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RWX has higher volatility (4.07%) compared to NETL (3.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NETL dropped -51.48% vs RWX's -73.62%.

On 5-year performance, NETL leads with 1.33% vs -2.65% for RWX. On fees, RWX is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, NETL has been the lower-risk option at 3.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, NETL has performed better with a 1.33% return vs -2.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RWX is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for NETL.

NETL has the higher dividend yield at 4.83%, compared with 3.78% for RWX.

NETL tracks Fundamental Income Net Lease Real Estate Index, while RWX tracks Dow Jones Global ex-U.S. Real Estate Securities Index. They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for NETL and 0.59% for RWX.

NETL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.86 vs 0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NETL and RWX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer