NETL vs. PFFR
NETL (NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF) and PFFR (InfraCap REIT Preferred ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NETL is a REIT fund tracking the Fundamental Income Net Lease Real Estate Index, while PFFR is a Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds fund tracking the Indxx REIT Preferred Stock Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, NETL returned 1.33%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for PFFR. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NETL charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for PFFR.
Performance
NETL vs. PFFR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NETL achieves a 10.34% return, which is significantly higher than PFFR's 0.80% return.
NETL
- 1D
- -1.14%
- 1M
- -1.07%
- YTD
- 10.34%
- 6M
- 9.20%
- 1Y
- 11.59%
- 3Y*
- 7.12%
- 5Y*
- 1.33%
- 10Y*
- —
PFFR
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- -0.75%
- YTD
- 0.80%
- 6M
- 0.96%
- 1Y
- 6.82%
- 3Y*
- 9.27%
- 5Y*
- 0.97%
- 10Y*
- —
NETL vs. PFFR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NETL NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF | 10.34% | 6.05% | -1.08% | 2.69% | -16.16% | 27.36% | -0.73% | 13.15% |
PFFR InfraCap REIT Preferred ETF | 0.80% | 5.36% | 7.12% | 21.04% | -23.90% | 6.76% | 0.19% | 8.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between NETL and PFFR is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 2019 | 0.39 |
The correlation between NETL and PFFR shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (1 year) to 0.39 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
NETL vs. PFFR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
NETL
PFFR
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Real Estate
NETL
PFFR
Basic Materials
NETL
-
PFFR
-
Communication Services
NETL
-
PFFR
-
Consumer Cyclical
NETL
-
PFFR
-
Consumer Defensive
NETL
-
PFFR
-
Energy
NETL
-
PFFR
-
Financial Services
NETL
-
PFFR
Healthcare
NETL
-
PFFR
-
Industrials
NETL
-
PFFR
-
Technology
NETL
-
PFFR
-
Utilities
NETL
-
PFFR
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NETL vs. PFFR — Risk / Return Rank
NETL
PFFR
NETL vs. PFFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF (NETL) and InfraCap REIT Preferred ETF (PFFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NETL | PFFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.16 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.27 | 1.04 | +0.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.99 | 2.44 | +1.55 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NETL | PFFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 | 0.87 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 | 0.09 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.20 | 0.16 | +0.04 |
Drawdowns
NETL vs. PFFR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NETL drawdown since its inception was -51.48%, roughly equal to the maximum PFFR drawdown of -53.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NETL and PFFR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NETL | PFFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.48% | -53.02% | +1.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.16% | -6.57% | -2.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.30% | -11.16% | -8.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.74% | -29.80% | -0.94% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.68% | -3.05% | -0.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.65% | -7.00% | -4.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.91% | 2.80% | +0.11% |
Volatility
NETL vs. PFFR - Volatility Comparison
NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF (NETL) has a higher volatility of 3.66% compared to InfraCap REIT Preferred ETF (PFFR) at 2.81%. This indicates that NETL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PFFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NETL | PFFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.66% | 2.81% | +0.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.66% | 6.14% | +3.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.57% | 7.91% | +5.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.94% | 10.47% | +7.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.92% | 20.54% | +5.38% |
NETL vs. PFFR - Expense Ratio Comparison
NETL has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than PFFR's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
NETL vs. PFFR - Dividend Comparison
NETL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.83%, less than PFFR's 8.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NETL NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF | 4.83% | 5.12% | 5.08% | 4.57% | 4.47% | 4.03% | 3.98% | 2.52% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PFFR InfraCap REIT Preferred ETF | 8.29% | 7.99% | 7.78% | 7.72% | 8.60% | 6.08% | 6.11% | 5.77% | 6.48% | 6.59% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NETL and PFFR have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NETL has higher volatility (3.66%) compared to PFFR (2.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NETL dropped -51.48% vs PFFR's -53.02%.
On 5-year performance, NETL leads with 1.33% vs 0.97% for PFFR. On fees, PFFR is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, PFFR has been the lower-risk option at 2.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, NETL has performed better with a 1.33% return vs 0.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PFFR is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for NETL.
PFFR has the higher dividend yield at 8.29%, compared with 4.83% for NETL.
NETL is categorized as REIT, while PFFR is Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds. NETL tracks Fundamental Income Net Lease Real Estate Index, while PFFR tracks Indxx REIT Preferred Stock Index. They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and Virtus Investment Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for NETL and 0.45% for PFFR.
PFFR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.87 vs 0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NETL and PFFR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer