NETL vs. BLDG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

NETL (NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF) and BLDG (Cambria Global Real Estate ETF) are both REIT funds. NETL is passively managed, while BLDG is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, NETL returned 1.33%/yr vs 2.24%/yr for BLDG. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NETL charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for BLDG.

Performance

NETL vs. BLDG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF (NETL) and Cambria Global Real Estate ETF (BLDG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NETL achieves a 10.34% return, which is significantly higher than BLDG's 5.95% return.

NETL

• 1D: -1.14%
• 1M: -1.07%
• YTD: 10.34%
• 6M: 9.20%
• 1Y: 11.59%
• 3Y*: 7.12%
• 5Y*: 1.33%
• 10Y*: —

BLDG

• 1D: -0.93%
• 1M: 0.12%
• YTD: 5.95%
• 6M: 5.25%
• 1Y: 10.27%
• 3Y*: 8.73%
• 5Y*: 2.24%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NETL vs. BLDG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
NETL NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF	10.34%	6.05%	-1.08%	2.69%	-16.16%	27.36%	19.17%
BLDG Cambria Global Real Estate ETF	5.95%	4.26%	8.18%	1.76%	-14.66%	22.47%	15.37%

Correlation

The correlation between NETL and BLDG is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.75
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.79
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2020	0.82

The correlation between NETL and BLDG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

NETL vs. BLDG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	NETL	BLDG
Real Estate	100.0%	98.6%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	1.4%
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

NETL vs. BLDG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NETL

NETL Risk / Return Rank: 25
NETL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
NETL Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
NETL Omega Ratio Rank: 22
NETL Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
NETL Martin Ratio Rank: 29

BLDG

BLDG Risk / Return Rank: 25
BLDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
BLDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
BLDG Omega Ratio Rank: 24
BLDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
BLDG Martin Ratio Rank: 26

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NETL vs. BLDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF (NETL) and Cambria Global Real Estate ETF (BLDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NETL	BLDG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.86	0.93	-0.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.26	1.35	-0.10
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.16	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.27	1.02	+0.25
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.99	3.60	+0.39
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NETL vs. BLDG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NETL Sharpe Ratio is 0.86, which is comparable to the BLDG Sharpe Ratio of 0.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NETL and BLDG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NETL	BLDG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86	0.93	-0.07
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.07	0.15	-0.07
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.20	0.45	-0.25

Drawdowns

NETL vs. BLDG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NETL drawdown since its inception was -51.48%, which is greater than BLDG's maximum drawdown of -27.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NETL and BLDG.

Drawdown Indicators

	NETL	BLDG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-51.48%	-27.25%	-24.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.16%	-10.08%	+0.92%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.30%	-18.57%	-0.73%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.74%	-27.25%	-3.49%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.68%	-2.76%	-0.92%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.65%	-9.23%	-2.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.91%	2.86%	+0.05%

Volatility

NETL vs. BLDG - Volatility Comparison

NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF (NETL) and Cambria Global Real Estate ETF (BLDG) have volatilities of 3.66% and 3.60%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NETL	BLDG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.66%	3.60%	+0.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.66%	8.23%	+1.43%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.57%	11.07%	+2.50%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.94%	15.26%	+2.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.92%	15.54%	+10.38%

NETL vs. BLDG - Expense Ratio Comparison

NETL has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than BLDG's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

NETL vs. BLDG - Dividend Comparison

NETL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.83%, less than BLDG's 5.72% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
BLDG Cambria Global Real Estate ETF	5.72%	7.46%	7.97%	4.99%	3.99%	10.40%	0.59%	0.00%
NETL NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF	4.83%	5.12%	5.08%	4.57%	4.47%	4.03%	3.98%	2.52%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NETL and BLDG in my portfolio?

NETL and BLDG have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NETL or BLDG?

NETL has higher volatility (3.66%) compared to BLDG (3.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NETL dropped -51.48% vs BLDG's -27.25%.

Which ETF is better, NETL or BLDG?

On 5-year performance, BLDG leads with 2.24% vs 1.33% for NETL. On fees, BLDG is cheaper at 0.59% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NETL or BLDG?

Over the 5-year period, BLDG has performed better with a 2.24% return vs 1.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NETL or BLDG?

BLDG is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for NETL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NETL or BLDG?

BLDG has the higher dividend yield at 5.72%, compared with 4.83% for NETL.

What is the main difference between NETL and BLDG?

They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and Cambria. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for NETL and 0.59% for BLDG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BLDG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.93 vs 0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.