NERD vs. SPYG
NERD (Roundhill Video Games ETF) and SPYG (State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NERD is a Gaming fund actively managed by Roundhill, while SPYG is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Growth Index. NERD is actively managed, while SPYG is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, NERD returned -4.89%/yr vs 13.28%/yr for SPYG. Their 0.65 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. NERD charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SPYG.
Performance
NERD vs. SPYG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NERD achieves a -12.26% return, which is significantly lower than SPYG's 10.06% return.
NERD
- 1D
- -3.19%
- 1M
- 2.76%
- 6M
- -8.36%
- YTD
- -12.26%
- 1Y
- -15.44%
- 3Y*
- 11.30%
- 5Y*
- -4.89%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 5.86%
SPYG
- 1D
- 1.45%
- 1M
- -0.05%
- 6M
- 9.50%
- YTD
- 10.06%
- 1Y
- 21.72%
- 3Y*
- 24.04%
- 5Y*
- 13.28%
- 10Y*
- 17.38%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.45%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $28.51K | $28.10K | $40.56K | |
| $321.11M | $273.47M | $308.09M |
NERD vs. SPYG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NERD Roundhill Video Games ETF | -12.26% | 23.14% | 28.52% | 12.94% | -43.30% | -17.57% | 89.66% | 8.14% |
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF | 10.06% | 22.09% | 35.99% | 30.02% | -29.41% | 32.01% | 33.46% | 17.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between NERD and SPYG is 0.50, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.59 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2019 | 0.65 |
The correlation between NERD and SPYG shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (1 year) to 0.65 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
NERD vs. SPYG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
NERD
SPYG
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
NERD
SPYG
Consumer Cyclical
NERD
SPYG
Technology
NERD
SPYG
Industrials
NERD
SPYG
Financial Services
NERD
SPYG
Basic Materials
NERD
-
SPYG
Consumer Defensive
NERD
-
SPYG
Energy
NERD
-
SPYG
Healthcare
NERD
-
SPYG
Real Estate
NERD
-
SPYG
Utilities
NERD
-
SPYG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NERD vs. SPYG — Risk / Return Rank
NERD
SPYG
NERD vs. SPYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Video Games ETF (NERD) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NERD | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.88 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 1.19 | -0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.50 | 1.42 | -1.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.82 | 5.17 | -5.98 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NERD vs. SPYG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NERD drawdown since its inception was -65.58%, roughly equal to the maximum SPYG drawdown of -67.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NERD and SPYG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NERD | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.58% | -67.63% | +2.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.23% | -13.76% | -19.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.23% | -22.14% | -11.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -54.10% | -32.67% | -21.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.67% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -43.09% | -4.33% | -38.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.09% | -24.20% | -11.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.32% | 3.78% | +16.54% |
Volatility
NERD vs. SPYG - Volatility Comparison
Roundhill Video Games ETF (NERD) has a higher volatility of 7.07% compared to State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) at 6.08%. This indicates that NERD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NERD | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.07% | 6.08% | +0.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.65% | 14.85% | +1.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.63% | 18.18% | +2.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.66% | 21.50% | +3.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.46% | 20.79% | +4.67% |
NERD vs. SPYG - Expense Ratio Comparison
NERD has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
NERD vs. SPYG - Dividend Comparison
NERD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.72%, more than SPYG's 0.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NERD Roundhill Video Games ETF | 0.72% | 0.63% | 1.74% | 1.07% | 0.69% | 0.02% | 1.05% | 0.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF | 0.49% | 0.52% | 0.60% | 1.15% | 1.03% | 0.62% | 0.90% | 1.37% | 1.51% | 1.41% | 1.55% | 1.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NERD and SPYG have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NERD has higher volatility (7.07%) compared to SPYG (6.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NERD dropped -65.58% vs SPYG's -67.63%.
On 5-year performance, SPYG leads with 13.28% vs -4.89% for NERD. On fees, SPYG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SPYG has been the lower-risk option at 6.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SPYG has performed better with a 13.28% return vs -4.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPYG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for NERD.
NERD has the higher dividend yield at 0.72%, compared with 0.49% for SPYG.
NERD is categorized as Gaming, while SPYG is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for NERD and 0.04% for SPYG.
SPYG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.08 vs -0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NERD and SPYG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer