NEOV vs. KULR
NEOV (NeoVolta Inc. Common Stock) and KULR (KULR Technology Group, Inc.) are both stocks. NEOV operates in Electrical Equipment & Parts (Industrials), while KULR operates in Electronic Components (Technology). Over the past 5 years, NEOV returned -19.78%/yr vs -30.48%/yr for KULR. Their 0.12 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
NEOV vs. KULR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NEOV achieves a -30.59% return, which is significantly lower than KULR's -10.47% return.
NEOV
- 1D
- -0.94%
- 1M
- -15.26%
- 6M
- -49.88%
- YTD
- -30.59%
- 1Y
- -57.88%
- 3Y*
- -12.87%
- 5Y*
- -19.78%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -5.52%
KULR
- 1D
- 2.32%
- 1M
- -31.17%
- 6M
- -25.56%
- YTD
- -10.47%
- 1Y
- -49.52%
- 3Y*
- -29.99%
- 5Y*
- -30.48%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -13.87%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $2.72M | $3.64M | $8.75M | |
| $2.02M | $2.74M | $5.74M |
NEOV vs. KULR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NEOV NeoVolta Inc. Common Stock | -30.59% | -41.65% | 225.62% | -42.65% | -60.20% | 60.78% | 45.33% |
KULR KULR Technology Group, Inc. | -10.47% | -89.58% | 1,818.92% | -84.58% | -56.52% | 87.76% | 54.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between NEOV and KULR is 0.33, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 20, 2020 | 0.12 |
Over the past year, NEOV and KULR have become more correlated (0.33) than their long-term average of 0.12, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
NEOV:
$75.65M
KULR:
$122.58M
NEOV:
-$0.31
KULR:
-$1.53
NEOV:
4.79
KULR:
6.63
NEOV:
3.82
KULR:
0.87
NEOV:
$16.05M
KULR:
$16.17M
NEOV:
$3.74M
KULR:
$770.97K
NEOV:
-$9.07M
KULR:
-$60.59M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NEOV vs. KULR — Risk / Return Rank
NEOV
KULR
NEOV vs. KULR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NeoVolta Inc. Common Stock (NEOV) and KULR Technology Group, Inc. (KULR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NEOV | KULR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 0.96 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.76 | -0.82 | +0.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.29 | -1.36 | +0.07 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NEOV vs. KULR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NEOV drawdown since its inception was -90.38%, smaller than the maximum KULR drawdown of -97.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEOV and KULR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NEOV | KULR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.38% | -97.23% | +6.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -73.60% | -63.00% | -10.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -79.40% | -94.74% | +15.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -90.38% | -96.86% | +6.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -70.57% | -93.10% | +22.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.50% | -66.66% | +26.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 43.15% | 38.49% | +4.66% |
Volatility
NEOV vs. KULR - Volatility Comparison
NeoVolta Inc. Common Stock (NEOV) and KULR Technology Group, Inc. (KULR) have volatilities of 26.17% and 25.82%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NEOV | KULR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 26.17% | 25.82% | +0.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 108.21% | 73.93% | +34.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 133.89% | 98.80% | +35.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 97.98% | 126.59% | -28.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 92.29% | 126.59% | -34.30% |
Dividends
NEOV vs. KULR - Dividend Comparison
Neither NEOV nor KULR has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
NEOV vs. KULR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between NeoVolta Inc. Common Stock and KULR Technology Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
NEOV and KULR have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NEOV has higher volatility (26.17%) compared to KULR (25.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NEOV dropped -90.38% vs KULR's -97.23%.
NEOV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.42 vs -0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NEOV and KULR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer