PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NEMG vs. OOQB
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

NEMG vs. OOQB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2x Long NEM Daily ETF (NEMG) and Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF (OOQB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

NEMG vs. OOQB - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NEMG achieves a 5.57% return, which is significantly higher than OOQB's -28.69% return.


NEMG

1D
9.74%
1M
-33.14%
YTD
5.57%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

OOQB

1D
5.72%
1M
-2.59%
YTD
-28.69%
6M
-45.98%
1Y
-14.59%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


NEMG vs. OOQB - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both NEMG and OOQB have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Return for Risk

NEMG vs. OOQB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NEMG

OOQB
OOQB Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
OOQB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OOQB Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
OOQB Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
OOQB Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
OOQB Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NEMG vs. OOQB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2x Long NEM Daily ETF (NEMG) and Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF (OOQB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

NEMG vs. OOQB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NEMGOOQBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.28

-0.57

+1.85

Correlation

The correlation between NEMG and OOQB is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

NEMG vs. OOQB - Dividend Comparison

NEMG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while OOQB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.89%.


Drawdowns

NEMG vs. OOQB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NEMG drawdown since its inception was -51.18%, roughly equal to the maximum OOQB drawdown of -53.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEMG and OOQB.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


NEMGOOQBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.18%

-53.44%

+2.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-53.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-38.22%

-50.78%

+12.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.96%

-19.94%

+5.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

23.98%

Volatility

NEMG vs. OOQB - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


NEMGOOQBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

46.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

101.56%

59.59%

+41.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

101.56%

61.96%

+39.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

101.56%

61.96%

+39.60%