PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NEMG vs. NFLU
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

NEMG vs. NFLU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2x Long NEM Daily ETF (NEMG) and T-REX 2X Long Netflix Daily Target ETF (NFLU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

NEMG vs. NFLU - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NEMG achieves a 5.57% return, which is significantly higher than NFLU's -1.14% return.


NEMG

1D
9.74%
1M
-33.14%
YTD
5.57%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NFLU

1D
7.04%
1M
-1.60%
YTD
-1.14%
6M
-43.54%
1Y
-15.54%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


NEMG vs. NFLU - Expense Ratio Comparison

NEMG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than NFLU's 1.05% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

NEMG vs. NFLU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NEMG

NFLU
NFLU Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
NFLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NFLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
NFLU Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
NFLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
NFLU Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NEMG vs. NFLU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2x Long NEM Daily ETF (NEMG) and T-REX 2X Long Netflix Daily Target ETF (NFLU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

NEMG vs. NFLU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NEMGNFLUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.28

0.28

+1.00

Correlation

The correlation between NEMG and NFLU is 0.11, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

NEMG vs. NFLU - Dividend Comparison

Neither NEMG nor NFLU has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

NEMG vs. NFLU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NEMG drawdown since its inception was -51.18%, smaller than the maximum NFLU drawdown of -72.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEMG and NFLU.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


NEMGNFLUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.18%

-72.10%

+20.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-72.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-38.22%

-56.84%

+18.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.96%

-24.06%

+10.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

38.59%

Volatility

NEMG vs. NFLU - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


NEMGNFLUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

53.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

101.56%

68.25%

+33.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

101.56%

69.30%

+32.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

101.56%

69.30%

+32.26%