NEMG vs. NFLU
NEMG (Leverage Shares 2x Long NEM Daily ETF) and NFLU (T-REX 2X Long Netflix Daily Target ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NEMG charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for NFLU.
Performance
NEMG vs. NFLU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NEMG achieves a -13.54% return, which is significantly higher than NFLU's -46.55% return.
NEMG
- 1D
- -4.18%
- 1M
- -13.08%
- YTD
- -13.54%
- 6M
- -21.93%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NFLU
- 1D
- -11.62%
- 1M
- -33.41%
- YTD
- -46.55%
- 6M
- -46.22%
- 1Y
- -72.52%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NEMG vs. NFLU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NEMG Leverage Shares 2x Long NEM Daily ETF | -13.54% | 22.87% |
NFLU T-REX 2X Long Netflix Daily Target ETF | -46.55% | -31.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between NEMG and NFLU is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2025 | 0.06 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NEMG vs. NFLU — Risk / Return Rank
NEMG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
NFLU
NEMG vs. NFLU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2x Long NEM Daily ETF (NEMG) and T-REX 2X Long Netflix Daily Target ETF (NFLU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NEMG | NFLU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.75 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.95 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.48 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NEMG vs. NFLU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NEMG drawdown since its inception was -57.56%, smaller than the maximum NFLU drawdown of -76.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEMG and NFLU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NEMG | NFLU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.56% | -76.67% | +19.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -76.67% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -49.40% | -76.67% | +27.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.00% | -29.07% | +6.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 48.84% | — |
Volatility
NEMG vs. NFLU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NEMG | NFLU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 16.58% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 50.91% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 102.42% | 68.00% | +34.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 102.42% | 69.14% | +33.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 102.42% | 69.14% | +33.28% |
NEMG vs. NFLU - Expense Ratio Comparison
NEMG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than NFLU's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
NEMG vs. NFLU - Dividend Comparison
Neither NEMG nor NFLU has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
NEMG and NFLU have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NEMG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NEMG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for NFLU.
NEMG and NFLU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and REX Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for NEMG and 1.05% for NFLU.
Find the right allocation for NEMG and NFLU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer