PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NEMG vs. AMDG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NEMG vs. AMDG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2x Long NEM Daily ETF (NEMG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NEMG achieves a -28.92% return, which is significantly lower than AMDG's 230.68% return.


NEMG

1D
-4.30%
1M
-8.31%
6M
-41.24%
YTD
-28.92%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

AMDG

1D
-3.81%
1M
-20.14%
6M
179.34%
YTD
230.68%
1Y
319.90%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
243.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$8.00M$7.90M$8.98M
$96.38K$81.09K$228.81K

NEMG vs. AMDG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between NEMG and AMDG is 0.43, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2025

0.43

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NEMG vs. AMDG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NEMG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


AMDG
AMDG Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
AMDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMDG Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
AMDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMDG Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NEMG vs. AMDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2x Long NEM Daily ETF (NEMG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NEMGAMDGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.98

NEMG vs. AMDG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NEMG vs. AMDG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NEMG drawdown since its inception was -61.96%, roughly equal to the maximum AMDG drawdown of -63.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEMG and AMDG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NEMGAMDGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.96%

-63.32%

+1.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-56.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-58.41%

-37.43%

-20.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.50%

-25.05%

-3.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

29.98%

Volatility

NEMG vs. AMDG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NEMGAMDGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

49.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

113.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

98.91%

142.79%

-43.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

98.91%

135.20%

-36.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

98.91%

135.20%

-36.29%

NEMG vs. AMDG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both NEMG and AMDG have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Dividends

NEMG vs. AMDG - Dividend Comparison

NEMG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AMDG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.39%.


Frequently Asked Questions


NEMG and AMDG have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

NEMG and AMDG have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

AMDG has the higher dividend yield at 3.39%, compared with 0.00% for NEMG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NEMG and AMDG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer