NELS vs. PSCX
NELS (Nelson Select ETF) and PSCX (Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NELS charges 1.69%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for PSCX.
Performance
NELS vs. PSCX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NELS achieves a 9.49% return, which is significantly higher than PSCX's 4.28% return.
NELS
- 1D
- -2.87%
- 1M
- 1.32%
- YTD
- 9.49%
- 6M
- 9.64%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PSCX
- 1D
- -0.92%
- 1M
- 0.38%
- YTD
- 4.28%
- 6M
- 5.25%
- 1Y
- 14.90%
- 3Y*
- 12.50%
- 5Y*
- 8.29%
- 10Y*
- —
NELS vs. PSCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NELS Nelson Select ETF | 9.49% | 2.42% |
PSCX Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF | 4.28% | 2.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between NELS and PSCX is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2025 | 0.87 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NELS vs. PSCX — Risk / Return Rank
NELS
PSCX
NELS vs. PSCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nelson Select ETF (NELS) and Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF (PSCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NELS | PSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.67 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.17 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.34 | 1.25 | +0.09 |
Drawdowns
NELS vs. PSCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NELS drawdown since its inception was -9.30%, smaller than the maximum PSCX drawdown of -10.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NELS and PSCX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NELS | PSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.30% | -10.20% | +0.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -4.20% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -9.61% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -10.20% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.88% | -0.92% | -1.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.61% | -1.86% | +0.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.82% | — |
Volatility
NELS vs. PSCX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NELS | PSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.24% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 4.32% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.80% | 5.61% | +9.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.80% | 7.08% | +7.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.80% | 6.97% | +7.83% |
NELS vs. PSCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NELS has a 1.69% expense ratio, which is higher than PSCX's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
NELS vs. PSCX - Dividend Comparison
Neither NELS nor PSCX has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
NELS and PSCX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PSCX is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PSCX is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.69% for NELS.
NELS and PSCX have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Nelson Capital Management and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 1.69% for NELS and 0.75% for PSCX.
Find the right allocation for NELS and PSCX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer