NELS vs. FTIF

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

NELS (Nelson Select ETF) and FTIF (First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. NELS is actively managed, while FTIF is passively managed. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NELS charges 1.69%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for FTIF.

Performance

NELS vs. FTIF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nelson Select ETF (NELS) and First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF (FTIF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NELS achieves a 10.77% return, which is significantly lower than FTIF's 22.14% return.

NELS

• 1D: -0.15%
• 1M: 1.26%
• YTD: 10.77%
• 6M: 10.11%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FTIF

• 1D: 1.19%
• 1M: -1.89%
• YTD: 22.14%
• 6M: 21.22%
• 1Y: 30.71%
• 3Y*: 14.45%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NELS vs. FTIF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
NELS Nelson Select ETF	10.77%	1.83%
FTIF First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF	22.14%	4.52%

Correlation

The correlation between NELS and FTIF is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2025	0.43

Return for Risk

NELS vs. FTIF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NELS

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FTIF

FTIF Risk / Return Rank: 71
FTIF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
FTIF Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
FTIF Omega Ratio Rank: 58
FTIF Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
FTIF Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NELS vs. FTIF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nelson Select ETF (NELS) and First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF (FTIF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NELS	FTIF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.01	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.79	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.35	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	5.65	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	15.88	—

Drawdowns

NELS vs. FTIF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NELS drawdown since its inception was -9.30%, smaller than the maximum FTIF drawdown of -27.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NELS and FTIF.

Drawdown Indicators

	NELS	FTIF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.30%	-27.83%	+18.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-5.46%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-27.83%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.75%	-3.40%	+1.65%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.65%	-5.95%	+4.30%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.94%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	NELS	FTIF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.51%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	10.69%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.70%	15.37%	-0.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.70%	18.92%	-4.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.70%	18.92%	-4.22%

NELS vs. FTIF - Expense Ratio Comparison

NELS has a 1.69% expense ratio, which is higher than FTIF's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

NELS vs. FTIF - Dividend Comparison

NELS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FTIF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.14%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
FTIF First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF	1.14%	1.45%	2.88%	1.55%
NELS Nelson Select ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NELS and FTIF in my portfolio?

NELS and FTIF have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, NELS or FTIF?

On fees, FTIF is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, NELS or FTIF?

FTIF is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 1.69% for NELS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NELS or FTIF?

FTIF has the higher dividend yield at 1.14%, compared with 0.00% for NELS.

What is the main difference between NELS and FTIF?

They also come from different issuers: Nelson Capital Management and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 1.69% for NELS and 0.60% for FTIF.