PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NELS vs. BUFH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NELS vs. BUFH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nelson Select ETF (NELS) and FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF (BUFH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NELS achieves a 10.77% return, which is significantly higher than BUFH's 2.49% return.


NELS

1D
-0.15%
1M
1.26%
YTD
10.77%
6M
10.11%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BUFH

1D
-0.05%
1M
0.21%
YTD
2.49%
6M
2.59%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NELS vs. BUFH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
NELS
Nelson Select ETF
10.77%1.83%
BUFH
FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF
2.49%1.39%

Correlation

The correlation between NELS and BUFH is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2025

0.72

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NELS vs. BUFH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nelson Select ETF (NELS) and FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF (BUFH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

NELS vs. BUFH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NELS vs. BUFH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NELS drawdown since its inception was -9.30%, which is greater than BUFH's maximum drawdown of -1.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NELS and BUFH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NELSBUFHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.30%

-1.53%

-7.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.75%

-0.07%

-1.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.65%

-0.18%

-1.47%

Volatility

NELS vs. BUFH - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NELSBUFHDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.70%

2.38%

+12.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.70%

2.38%

+12.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.70%

2.38%

+12.32%

NELS vs. BUFH - Expense Ratio Comparison

NELS has a 1.69% expense ratio, which is higher than BUFH's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

NELS vs. BUFH - Dividend Comparison

Neither NELS nor BUFH has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


NELS and BUFH have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BUFH is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BUFH is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.69% for NELS.

NELS and BUFH have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

NELS is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while BUFH is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Nelson Capital Management and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 1.69% for NELS and 0.95% for BUFH.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NELS and BUFH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer