PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NEHI vs. FDL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NEHI vs. FDL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEOS Ethereum High Income ETF (NEHI) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NEHI achieves a -36.78% return, which is significantly lower than FDL's 14.21% return.


NEHI

1D
-1.50%
1M
-23.11%
YTD
-36.78%
6M
-38.94%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FDL

1D
0.78%
1M
0.32%
YTD
14.21%
6M
15.52%
1Y
25.50%
3Y*
19.57%
5Y*
12.69%
10Y*
11.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NEHI vs. FDL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between NEHI and FDL is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2025

-0.11

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NEHI vs. FDL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NEHI

FDL
FDL Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
FDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDL Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
FDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDL Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NEHI vs. FDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Ethereum High Income ETF (NEHI) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

NEHI vs. FDL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NEHIFDLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-1.10

0.45

-1.56

Drawdowns

NEHI vs. FDL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NEHI drawdown since its inception was -43.46%, smaller than the maximum FDL drawdown of -65.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEHI and FDL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NEHIFDLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.46%

-65.93%

+22.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-43.46%

-1.41%

-42.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.23%

-9.66%

-15.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.75%

Volatility

NEHI vs. FDL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NEHIFDLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

57.19%

11.30%

+45.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

57.19%

14.31%

+42.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

57.19%

17.11%

+40.08%

NEHI vs. FDL - Expense Ratio Comparison

NEHI has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than FDL's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

NEHI vs. FDL - Dividend Comparison

NEHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 24.72%, more than FDL's 3.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDL
First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund
3.65%4.04%4.96%4.58%3.58%4.59%4.48%3.75%3.97%3.18%2.93%3.65%
NEHI
NEOS Ethereum High Income ETF
24.72%2.87%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


NEHI and FDL have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FDL is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FDL is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for NEHI.

NEHI has the higher dividend yield at 24.72%, compared with 3.65% for FDL.

NEHI is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while FDL is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Neos and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for NEHI and 0.45% for FDL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NEHI and FDL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer