PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NEGG vs. CCJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NEGG vs. CCJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Newegg Commerce, Inc. (NEGG) and Cameco Corporation (CCJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NEGG achieves a -63.49% return, which is significantly lower than CCJ's 10.35% return. Over the past 10 years, NEGG has underperformed CCJ with an annualized return of -23.00%, while CCJ has yielded a comparatively higher 25.74% annualized return.


NEGG

1D
-0.43%
1M
-20.37%
YTD
-63.49%
6M
-70.11%
1Y
77.83%
3Y*
-9.01%
5Y*
-38.30%
10Y*
-23.00%

CCJ

1D
2.01%
1M
-12.51%
YTD
10.35%
6M
10.35%
1Y
52.94%
3Y*
47.60%
5Y*
36.72%
10Y*
25.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NEGG vs. CCJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NEGG
Newegg Commerce, Inc.
-63.49%540.26%-68.54%-3.82%-87.37%149.88%52.57%-70.00%-35.23%16.67%
CCJ
Cameco Corporation
10.35%78.38%19.47%90.49%4.35%63.19%51.47%-21.08%23.58%-8.20%

Correlation

The correlation between NEGG and CCJ is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 22, 2010

0.12

The correlation between NEGG and CCJ shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (all time) to 0.25 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

NEGG:

-$1.16

CCJ:

CA$1.49

PS Ratio

NEGG:

0.28

CCJ:

17.37

Total Revenue (TTM)

NEGG:

$1.31B

CCJ:

CA$3.54B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NEGG:

$148.16M

CCJ:

CA$1.04B

EBITDA (TTM)

NEGG:

-$19.73M

CCJ:

CA$996.66M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NEGG vs. CCJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NEGG
NEGG Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
NEGG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NEGG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
NEGG Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
NEGG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
NEGG Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

CCJ
CCJ Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
CCJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CCJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
CCJ Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
CCJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
CCJ Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NEGG vs. CCJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Newegg Commerce, Inc. (NEGG) and Cameco Corporation (CCJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NEGGCCJDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.20

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.90

1.83

-0.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.35

4.43

-3.08

NEGG vs. CCJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NEGG Sharpe Ratio is 0.43, which is lower than the CCJ Sharpe Ratio of 0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NEGG and CCJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NEGG vs. CCJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NEGG drawdown since its inception was -99.83%, which is greater than CCJ's maximum drawdown of -87.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEGG and CCJ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NEGGCCJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.83%

-87.53%

-12.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-86.90%

-29.13%

-57.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-90.28%

-40.01%

-50.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-99.74%

-40.01%

-59.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.74%

-57.22%

-42.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.08%

-24.71%

-74.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-85.54%

-46.07%

-39.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

58.06%

11.99%

+46.07%

Volatility

NEGG vs. CCJ - Volatility Comparison

Newegg Commerce, Inc. (NEGG) has a higher volatility of 22.82% compared to Cameco Corporation (CCJ) at 17.90%. This indicates that NEGG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CCJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NEGGCCJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.82%

17.90%

+4.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

64.39%

39.91%

+24.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

182.18%

55.17%

+127.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

152.40%

50.01%

+102.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

145.24%

46.75%

+98.49%

Dividends

NEGG vs. CCJ - Dividend Comparison

NEGG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CCJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CCJ
Cameco Corporation
0.17%0.19%0.22%0.20%0.39%0.29%0.46%0.67%0.53%4.33%3.82%3.24%
NEGG
Newegg Commerce, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

NEGG vs. CCJ - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Newegg Commerce, Inc. and Cameco Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B20222023202420252026
347.84M
847.55M
(NEGG) Total Revenue
(CCJ) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. NEGG values in USD, CCJ values in CAD

Frequently Asked Questions


NEGG and CCJ have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NEGG has higher volatility (22.82%) compared to CCJ (17.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NEGG dropped -99.83% vs CCJ's -87.53%.

CCJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.96 vs 0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NEGG and CCJ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer