PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NEE vs. T
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NEE vs. T - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NextEra Energy, Inc. (NEE) and AT&T Inc. (T). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NEE achieves a 11.17% return, which is significantly higher than T's -7.04% return. Over the past 10 years, NEE has outperformed T with an annualized return of 13.35%, while T has yielded a comparatively lower 2.10% annualized return.


NEE

1D
-0.90%
1M
1.44%
6M
6.72%
YTD
11.17%
1Y
19.22%
3Y*
8.20%
5Y*
5.75%
10Y*
13.35%
ALL TIME*
14.41%

T

1D
0.64%
1M
2.62%
6M
-2.84%
YTD
-7.04%
1Y
-13.37%
3Y*
20.93%
5Y*
7.13%
10Y*
2.10%
ALL TIME*
9.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NEE vs. T - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NEE
NextEra Energy, Inc.
11.17%15.47%21.46%-25.30%-8.54%23.39%30.06%42.69%14.30%34.39%
T
AT&T Inc.
-7.04%13.97%44.08%-2.74%5.76%-8.09%-21.37%45.55%-22.25%-4.01%

Correlation

The correlation between NEE and T is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 10, 2003

0.35

The correlation between NEE and T shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (1 year) to 0.35 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NEE:

$183.53B

T:

$152.52B

EPS

NEE:

$5.91

T:

$3.05

PE Ratio

NEE:

14.88

T:

7.19

PEG Ratio

NEE:

0.76

T:

0.30

PS Ratio

NEE:

4.36

T:

1.25

Total Revenue (TTM)

NEE:

$27.93B

T:

$125.65B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NEE:

$13.35B

T:

$105.41B

EBITDA (TTM)

NEE:

$14.56B

T:

$54.70B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NEE vs. T — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NEE
NEE Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
NEE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NEE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
NEE Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
NEE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
NEE Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

T
T Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
T Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
T Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
T Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
T Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
T Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NEE vs. T - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NextEra Energy, Inc. (NEE) and AT&T Inc. (T). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NEETDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

0.92

+0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.33

-0.46

+1.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.22

-1.03

+4.26

NEE vs. T - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NEE Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is higher than the T Sharpe Ratio of -0.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NEE and T, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NEE vs. T - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NEE drawdown since its inception was -47.81%, smaller than the maximum T drawdown of -64.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEE and T.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NEETDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.81%

-64.15%

+16.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.53%

-28.89%

+14.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.57%

-28.89%

-5.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.97%

-32.01%

-12.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.97%

-42.35%

-2.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.44%

-21.57%

+12.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.93%

-15.74%

+6.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.98%

12.94%

-6.96%

Volatility

NEE vs. T - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for NextEra Energy, Inc. (NEE) is 4.78%, while AT&T Inc. (T) has a volatility of 9.59%. This indicates that NEE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than T based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NEETDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.78%

9.59%

-4.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.70%

19.91%

-3.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.86%

23.72%

-0.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.92%

24.38%

+2.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.49%

23.92%

+1.57%

Dividends

NEE vs. T - Dividend Comparison

NEE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.70%, less than T's 6.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NEE
NextEra Energy, Inc.
2.70%2.82%2.87%3.08%2.03%1.65%1.81%2.06%2.55%2.52%2.91%2.96%
T
AT&T Inc.
6.58%4.47%4.87%6.62%6.66%8.46%7.23%5.22%7.01%5.04%4.51%5.46%

Financials

NEE vs. T - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between NextEra Energy, Inc. and AT&T Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
6.70B
33.47B
(NEE) Total Revenue
(T) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


NEE and T have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

T has higher volatility (9.59%) compared to NEE (4.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NEE dropped -47.81% vs T's -64.15%.

NEE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.85 vs -0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NEE and T

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer