NEAR vs. VT
NEAR (iShares Short Duration Bond Active ETF) and VT (Vanguard Total World Stock ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NEAR is a Short-Term Bond fund actively managed by iShares, while VT is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global All Cap Index. NEAR is actively managed, while VT is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, NEAR returned 2.85%/yr vs 12.25%/yr for VT. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NEAR charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for VT.
Performance
NEAR vs. VT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NEAR achieves a 0.98% return, which is significantly lower than VT's 10.03% return. Over the past 10 years, NEAR has underperformed VT with an annualized return of 2.85%, while VT has yielded a comparatively higher 12.25% annualized return.
NEAR
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 0.25%
- 6M
- 0.97%
- YTD
- 0.98%
- 1Y
- 3.62%
- 3Y*
- 5.46%
- 5Y*
- 3.91%
- 10Y*
- 2.85%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.43%
VT
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- -2.14%
- 6M
- 7.09%
- YTD
- 10.03%
- 1Y
- 20.89%
- 3Y*
- 18.12%
- 5Y*
- 10.45%
- 10Y*
- 12.25%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.76%
NEAR vs. VT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NEAR iShares Short Duration Bond Active ETF | 0.98% | 5.90% | 5.09% | 7.42% | 0.41% | 0.32% | 1.39% | 3.55% | 1.71% | 1.41% |
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 10.03% | 22.43% | 16.49% | 22.02% | -18.00% | 18.27% | 16.59% | 26.81% | -9.76% | 24.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between NEAR and VT is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2013 | 0.07 |
Over the past year, NEAR and VT have become more correlated (0.31) than their long-term average of 0.07, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NEAR vs. VT — Risk / Return Rank
NEAR
VT
NEAR vs. VT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Short Duration Bond Active ETF (NEAR) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NEAR | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.89 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.54 | 1.28 | +0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.21 | 2.17 | +1.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.56 | 9.18 | +5.38 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NEAR vs. VT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NEAR drawdown since its inception was -9.61%, smaller than the maximum VT drawdown of -50.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEAR and VT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NEAR | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.61% | -50.27% | +40.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.13% | -9.67% | +8.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.16% | -16.51% | +15.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -1.32% | -26.38% | +25.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -9.61% | -34.24% | +24.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.04% | -2.83% | +2.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.16% | -6.98% | +6.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.25% | 2.28% | -2.03% |
Volatility
NEAR vs. VT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Short Duration Bond Active ETF (NEAR) is 0.33%, while Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) has a volatility of 3.89%. This indicates that NEAR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NEAR | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.33% | 3.89% | -3.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.07% | 11.53% | -10.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.37% | 13.73% | -12.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.36% | 16.18% | -14.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.50% | 17.16% | -14.66% |
NEAR vs. VT - Expense Ratio Comparison
NEAR has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than VT's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
NEAR vs. VT - Dividend Comparison
NEAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.43%, more than VT's 1.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NEAR iShares Short Duration Bond Active ETF | 4.43% | 4.54% | 5.00% | 4.59% | 1.78% | 0.76% | 1.53% | 2.69% | 2.25% | 1.52% | 1.07% | 0.85% |
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 1.61% | 1.82% | 1.95% | 2.08% | 2.20% | 1.82% | 1.66% | 2.32% | 2.53% | 2.11% | 2.39% | 2.45% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NEAR and VT have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VT has higher volatility (3.89%) compared to NEAR (0.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NEAR dropped -9.61% vs VT's -50.27%.
On 10-year performance, VT leads with 12.25% vs 2.85% for NEAR. On fees, VT is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, NEAR has been the lower-risk option at 0.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VT has performed better with a 12.25% return vs 2.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VT is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for NEAR.
NEAR has the higher dividend yield at 4.43%, compared with 1.61% for VT.
NEAR is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while VT is Global Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for NEAR and 0.06% for VT.
NEAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.66 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NEAR and VT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer