PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NEAR vs. JPST
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NEAR vs. JPST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Short Duration Bond Active ETF (NEAR) and JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF (JPST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NEAR achieves a 0.63% return, which is significantly lower than JPST's 1.48% return.


NEAR

1D
-0.10%
1M
0.11%
YTD
0.63%
6M
0.83%
1Y
3.79%
3Y*
5.48%
5Y*
3.84%
10Y*
2.84%

JPST

1D
-0.04%
1M
0.24%
YTD
1.48%
6M
1.62%
1Y
4.15%
3Y*
5.13%
5Y*
3.63%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NEAR vs. JPST - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NEAR
iShares Short Duration Bond Active ETF
0.63%5.90%5.09%7.42%0.41%0.32%1.39%3.55%1.71%0.86%
JPST
JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF
1.48%4.99%5.58%5.13%1.14%0.11%2.18%3.34%2.23%0.98%

Correlation

The correlation between NEAR and JPST is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2017

0.47

Over the past year, NEAR and JPST have become more correlated (0.68) than their long-term average of 0.47, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NEAR vs. JPST — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NEAR
NEAR Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
NEAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NEAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
NEAR Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
NEAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
NEAR Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

JPST
JPST Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
JPST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPST Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPST Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
JPST Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPST Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NEAR vs. JPST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Short Duration Bond Active ETF (NEAR) and JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF (JPST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NEARJPSTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-4.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-11.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.56

3.65

-2.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.36

28.05

-24.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.26

133.62

-118.36

NEAR vs. JPST - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NEAR Sharpe Ratio is 2.75, which is lower than the JPST Sharpe Ratio of 7.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NEAR and JPST, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NEAR vs. JPST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NEAR drawdown since its inception was -9.61%, which is greater than JPST's maximum drawdown of -3.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEAR and JPST.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NEARJPSTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.61%

-3.28%

-6.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.13%

-0.15%

-0.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.16%

-0.30%

-0.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-1.32%

-0.79%

-0.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-9.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.24%

-0.08%

-0.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.16%

-0.08%

-0.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.25%

0.03%

+0.22%

Volatility

NEAR vs. JPST - Volatility Comparison

iShares Short Duration Bond Active ETF (NEAR) has a higher volatility of 0.48% compared to JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF (JPST) at 0.18%. This indicates that NEAR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JPST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NEARJPSTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.48%

0.18%

+0.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.06%

0.38%

+0.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.39%

0.54%

+0.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.35%

0.58%

+0.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.50%

0.93%

+1.57%

NEAR vs. JPST - Expense Ratio Comparison

NEAR has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than JPST's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

NEAR vs. JPST - Dividend Comparison

NEAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.44%, more than JPST's 4.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JPST
JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF
4.26%4.43%5.16%4.79%1.83%0.73%1.43%2.69%2.07%0.96%0.00%0.00%
NEAR
iShares Short Duration Bond Active ETF
4.44%4.54%5.00%4.59%1.78%0.76%1.53%2.69%2.25%1.52%1.07%0.85%

Frequently Asked Questions


NEAR and JPST have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NEAR has higher volatility (0.48%) compared to JPST (0.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NEAR dropped -9.61% vs JPST's -3.28%.

On 5-year performance, NEAR leads with 3.84% vs 3.63% for JPST. On fees, JPST is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, JPST has been the lower-risk option at 0.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, NEAR has performed better with a 3.84% return vs 3.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JPST is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for NEAR.

NEAR has the higher dividend yield at 4.44%, compared with 4.26% for JPST.

NEAR is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while JPST is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: iShares and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for NEAR and 0.18% for JPST.

JPST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.66 vs 2.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NEAR and JPST

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer