PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
NEAR vs. MINT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between NEAR and MINT is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.3

Performance

NEAR vs. MINT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Short Maturity Bond ETF (NEAR) and PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Strategy Fund (MINT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

22.00%23.00%24.00%25.00%26.00%27.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
27.26%
25.60%
NEAR
MINT

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

NEAR:

3.00

MINT:

13.43

Sortino Ratio

NEAR:

4.40

MINT:

31.53

Omega Ratio

NEAR:

1.61

MINT:

9.29

Calmar Ratio

NEAR:

6.63

MINT:

45.04

Martin Ratio

NEAR:

17.95

MINT:

492.76

Ulcer Index

NEAR:

0.28%

MINT:

0.01%

Daily Std Dev

NEAR:

1.69%

MINT:

0.44%

Max Drawdown

NEAR:

-9.60%

MINT:

-4.62%

Current Drawdown

NEAR:

-0.04%

MINT:

0.00%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NEAR achieves a 0.12% return, which is significantly lower than MINT's 0.24% return. Over the past 10 years, NEAR has outperformed MINT with an annualized return of 2.34%, while MINT has yielded a comparatively lower 2.22% annualized return.


NEAR

YTD

0.12%

1M

0.56%

6M

2.70%

1Y

5.07%

5Y*

2.89%

10Y*

2.34%

MINT

YTD

0.24%

1M

0.44%

6M

2.72%

1Y

5.78%

5Y*

2.53%

10Y*

2.22%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


NEAR vs. MINT - Expense Ratio Comparison

NEAR has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than MINT's 0.36% expense ratio.


MINT
PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Strategy Fund
Expense ratio chart for MINT: current value at 0.36% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.36%
Expense ratio chart for NEAR: current value at 0.25% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.25%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

NEAR vs. MINT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NEAR
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of NEAR is 9696
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of NEAR is 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of NEAR is 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of NEAR is 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of NEAR is 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of NEAR is 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

MINT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MINT is 100100
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MINT is 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MINT is 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MINT is 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MINT is 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MINT is 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

NEAR vs. MINT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Short Maturity Bond ETF (NEAR) and PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Strategy Fund (MINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for NEAR, currently valued at 3.00, compared to the broader market0.002.004.003.0013.43
The chart of Sortino ratio for NEAR, currently valued at 4.40, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.004.4031.53
The chart of Omega ratio for NEAR, currently valued at 1.61, compared to the broader market1.002.003.001.619.29
The chart of Calmar ratio for NEAR, currently valued at 6.63, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.006.6345.04
The chart of Martin ratio for NEAR, currently valued at 17.95, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0017.95492.76
NEAR
MINT

The current NEAR Sharpe Ratio is 3.00, which is lower than the MINT Sharpe Ratio of 13.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NEAR and MINT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio5.0010.0015.00AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
3.00
13.43
NEAR
MINT

Dividends

NEAR vs. MINT - Dividend Comparison

NEAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.00%, less than MINT's 5.21% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
NEAR
iShares Short Maturity Bond ETF
5.00%5.00%4.58%1.78%0.76%1.53%2.69%2.25%1.52%1.07%0.85%0.85%
MINT
PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Strategy Fund
5.21%5.22%4.91%1.90%0.44%1.15%2.65%2.32%1.61%1.35%0.88%0.80%

Drawdowns

NEAR vs. MINT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NEAR drawdown since its inception was -9.60%, which is greater than MINT's maximum drawdown of -4.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEAR and MINT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-0.80%-0.60%-0.40%-0.20%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-0.04%
0
NEAR
MINT

Volatility

NEAR vs. MINT - Volatility Comparison

iShares Short Maturity Bond ETF (NEAR) has a higher volatility of 0.56% compared to PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Strategy Fund (MINT) at 0.10%. This indicates that NEAR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MINT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.10%0.20%0.30%0.40%0.50%0.60%0.70%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
0.56%
0.10%
NEAR
MINT
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab