PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NEAGX vs. NEEIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NEAGX vs. NEEIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Needham Aggressive Growth Fund (NEAGX) and Needham Growth Fund Institutional Class (NEEIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with NEAGX having a 64.16% return and NEEIX slightly higher at 65.52%.


NEAGX

1D
1.28%
1M
11.45%
YTD
64.16%
6M
61.68%
1Y
94.43%
3Y*
39.56%
5Y*
23.57%
10Y*
22.99%

NEEIX

1D
1.92%
1M
12.78%
YTD
65.52%
6M
62.14%
1Y
100.79%
3Y*
32.34%
5Y*
16.36%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NEAGX vs. NEEIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NEAGX
Needham Aggressive Growth Fund
64.16%26.40%14.31%37.65%-27.53%37.56%51.53%43.82%-16.09%8.75%
NEEIX
Needham Growth Fund Institutional Class
65.52%9.32%19.26%27.30%-33.26%28.13%42.39%43.15%-10.13%8.47%

Correlation

The correlation between NEAGX and NEEIX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017

0.95

The correlation between NEAGX and NEEIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NEAGX vs. NEEIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NEAGX
NEAGX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
NEAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NEAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
NEAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
NEAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
NEAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

NEEIX
NEEIX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
NEEIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NEEIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
NEEIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
NEEIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
NEEIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NEAGX vs. NEEIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Needham Aggressive Growth Fund (NEAGX) and Needham Growth Fund Institutional Class (NEEIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NEAGXNEEIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.54

1.53

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.83

7.61

-0.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

26.82

25.35

+1.47

NEAGX vs. NEEIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NEAGX Sharpe Ratio is 3.50, which is comparable to the NEEIX Sharpe Ratio of 3.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NEAGX and NEEIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NEAGX vs. NEEIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NEAGX drawdown since its inception was -41.80%, roughly equal to the maximum NEEIX drawdown of -43.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEAGX and NEEIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NEAGXNEEIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.80%

-43.11%

+1.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.01%

-13.22%

-0.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.49%

-36.13%

+7.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.31%

-43.11%

+6.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.66%

-10.82%

+2.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.56%

3.96%

-0.40%

Volatility

NEAGX vs. NEEIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Needham Aggressive Growth Fund (NEAGX) is 11.64%, while Needham Growth Fund Institutional Class (NEEIX) has a volatility of 12.91%. This indicates that NEAGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NEEIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NEAGXNEEIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.64%

12.91%

-1.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.15%

22.93%

-0.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.36%

28.96%

-1.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.92%

28.73%

-3.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.34%

25.98%

-1.64%

NEAGX vs. NEEIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NEAGX has a 1.86% expense ratio, which is higher than NEEIX's 1.21% expense ratio.


Dividends

NEAGX vs. NEEIX - Dividend Comparison

NEAGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.30%, less than NEEIX's 4.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NEAGX
Needham Aggressive Growth Fund
1.30%2.14%0.00%0.00%0.00%7.10%3.91%10.64%16.57%5.17%6.72%11.88%
NEEIX
Needham Growth Fund Institutional Class
4.33%7.16%7.48%0.00%1.72%6.70%5.58%11.09%17.58%9.64%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, NEAGX and NEEIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

NEEIX has higher volatility (12.91%) compared to NEAGX (11.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NEAGX dropped -41.80% vs NEEIX's -43.11%.

NEAGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.50 vs 3.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NEAGX and NEEIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer