NEEIX vs. CIPIX
NEEIX (Needham Growth Fund Institutional Class) and CIPIX (Champlain Mid Cap Fund Institutional Class) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, NEEIX returned 16.33%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for CIPIX. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NEEIX charges 1.21%/yr vs 0.84%/yr for CIPIX.
Performance
NEEIX vs. CIPIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NEEIX achieves a 62.40% return, which is significantly higher than CIPIX's -2.17% return.
NEEIX
- 1D
- 3.86%
- 1M
- 10.66%
- YTD
- 62.40%
- 6M
- 59.28%
- 1Y
- 96.29%
- 3Y*
- 30.34%
- 5Y*
- 16.33%
- 10Y*
- —
CIPIX
- 1D
- 1.15%
- 1M
- 0.80%
- YTD
- -2.17%
- 6M
- -3.98%
- 1Y
- -0.04%
- 3Y*
- 3.59%
- 5Y*
- 0.15%
- 10Y*
- 9.00%
NEEIX vs. CIPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NEEIX Needham Growth Fund Institutional Class | 62.40% | 9.32% | 19.26% | 27.30% | -33.26% | 28.13% | 42.39% | 43.15% | -10.13% | 8.47% |
CIPIX Champlain Mid Cap Fund Institutional Class | -2.17% | 1.66% | 5.93% | 15.66% | -26.32% | 24.78% | 29.40% | 26.56% | 3.65% | 13.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between NEEIX and CIPIX is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017 | 0.79 |
Over the past year, the correlation between NEEIX and CIPIX has dropped to 0.57 - well below their long-term average of 0.79, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NEEIX vs. CIPIX — Risk / Return Rank
NEEIX
CIPIX
NEEIX vs. CIPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Needham Growth Fund Institutional Class (NEEIX) and Champlain Mid Cap Fund Institutional Class (CIPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NEEIX | CIPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.01 | +0.50 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.28 | -0.02 | +7.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 24.26 | -0.06 | +24.32 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NEEIX vs. CIPIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NEEIX drawdown since its inception was -43.11%, which is greater than CIPIX's maximum drawdown of -33.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEEIX and CIPIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NEEIX | CIPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.11% | -33.84% | -9.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.22% | -14.65% | +1.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.13% | -22.70% | -13.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.11% | -33.02% | -10.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.84% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -12.07% | +12.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.82% | -7.31% | -3.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.96% | 5.78% | -1.82% |
Volatility
NEEIX vs. CIPIX - Volatility Comparison
Needham Growth Fund Institutional Class (NEEIX) has a higher volatility of 13.03% compared to Champlain Mid Cap Fund Institutional Class (CIPIX) at 5.09%. This indicates that NEEIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CIPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NEEIX | CIPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.03% | 5.09% | +7.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.11% | 11.40% | +11.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.86% | 14.99% | +13.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.71% | 19.09% | +9.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.98% | 18.89% | +7.09% |
NEEIX vs. CIPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NEEIX has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is higher than CIPIX's 0.84% expense ratio.
Dividends
NEEIX vs. CIPIX - Dividend Comparison
NEEIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.41%, less than CIPIX's 17.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIPIX Champlain Mid Cap Fund Institutional Class | 17.61% | 17.23% | 7.33% | 0.31% | 1.39% | 9.92% | 4.49% | 4.01% | 6.57% | 0.14% | 4.28% | 8.40% |
NEEIX Needham Growth Fund Institutional Class | 4.41% | 7.16% | 7.48% | 0.00% | 1.72% | 6.70% | 5.58% | 11.09% | 17.58% | 9.64% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NEEIX and CIPIX have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NEEIX has higher volatility (13.03%) compared to CIPIX (5.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NEEIX dropped -43.11% vs CIPIX's -33.84%.
NEEIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.34 vs -0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NEEIX and CIPIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer