PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NEAGX vs. ALFAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NEAGX vs. ALFAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Needham Aggressive Growth Fund (NEAGX) and Lord Abbett Alpha Strategy Fund (ALFAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NEAGX achieves a 64.16% return, which is significantly higher than ALFAX's 22.34% return. Over the past 10 years, NEAGX has outperformed ALFAX with an annualized return of 22.99%, while ALFAX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.33% annualized return.


NEAGX

1D
1.28%
1M
11.45%
YTD
64.16%
6M
61.68%
1Y
94.43%
3Y*
39.56%
5Y*
23.57%
10Y*
22.99%

ALFAX

1D
0.70%
1M
4.98%
YTD
22.34%
6M
19.97%
1Y
35.19%
3Y*
17.23%
5Y*
5.91%
10Y*
11.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NEAGX vs. ALFAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NEAGX
Needham Aggressive Growth Fund
64.16%26.40%14.31%37.65%-27.53%37.56%51.53%43.82%-16.09%8.75%
ALFAX
Lord Abbett Alpha Strategy Fund
22.34%8.80%13.18%13.92%-23.50%15.01%26.16%24.95%-9.72%20.61%

Correlation

The correlation between NEAGX and ALFAX is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2001

0.86

The correlation between NEAGX and ALFAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NEAGX vs. ALFAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NEAGX
NEAGX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
NEAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NEAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
NEAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
NEAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
NEAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

ALFAX
ALFAX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
ALFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
ALFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NEAGX vs. ALFAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Needham Aggressive Growth Fund (NEAGX) and Lord Abbett Alpha Strategy Fund (ALFAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NEAGXALFAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.54

1.36

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.83

3.58

+3.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

26.82

13.63

+13.19

NEAGX vs. ALFAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NEAGX Sharpe Ratio is 3.50, which is higher than the ALFAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NEAGX and ALFAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NEAGX vs. ALFAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NEAGX drawdown since its inception was -41.80%, smaller than the maximum ALFAX drawdown of -57.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEAGX and ALFAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NEAGXALFAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.80%

-57.11%

+15.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.01%

-10.31%

-3.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.49%

-25.01%

-3.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.31%

-33.88%

-2.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.31%

-40.29%

+3.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.66%

-12.85%

+4.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.56%

2.70%

+0.86%

Volatility

NEAGX vs. ALFAX - Volatility Comparison

Needham Aggressive Growth Fund (NEAGX) has a higher volatility of 11.64% compared to Lord Abbett Alpha Strategy Fund (ALFAX) at 6.76%. This indicates that NEAGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ALFAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NEAGXALFAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.64%

6.76%

+4.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.15%

14.12%

+8.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.36%

17.81%

+9.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.92%

20.00%

+4.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.34%

20.79%

+3.55%

NEAGX vs. ALFAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NEAGX has a 1.86% expense ratio, which is higher than ALFAX's 1.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

NEAGX vs. ALFAX - Dividend Comparison

NEAGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.30%, less than ALFAX's 4.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ALFAX
Lord Abbett Alpha Strategy Fund
4.34%5.30%0.80%0.46%6.94%5.38%7.99%14.66%16.61%11.96%11.85%15.83%
NEAGX
Needham Aggressive Growth Fund
1.30%2.14%0.00%0.00%0.00%7.10%3.91%10.64%16.57%5.17%6.72%11.88%

Frequently Asked Questions


NEAGX and ALFAX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NEAGX has higher volatility (11.64%) compared to ALFAX (6.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NEAGX dropped -41.80% vs ALFAX's -57.11%.

NEAGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.50 vs 2.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NEAGX and ALFAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer