PortfoliosLab logo
ALFAX vs. QAI
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between ALFAX and QAI is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

ALFAX vs. QAI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lord Abbett Alpha Strategy Fund (ALFAX) and IQ Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF (QAI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

40.00%60.00%80.00%100.00%120.00%140.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
114.02%
55.77%
ALFAX
QAI

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

ALFAX:

-0.02

QAI:

0.61

Sortino Ratio

ALFAX:

0.11

QAI:

0.86

Omega Ratio

ALFAX:

1.01

QAI:

1.12

Calmar Ratio

ALFAX:

-0.02

QAI:

0.56

Martin Ratio

ALFAX:

-0.06

QAI:

2.35

Ulcer Index

ALFAX:

8.26%

QAI:

1.85%

Daily Std Dev

ALFAX:

21.01%

QAI:

7.33%

Max Drawdown

ALFAX:

-62.76%

QAI:

-14.95%

Current Drawdown

ALFAX:

-23.52%

QAI:

-2.51%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ALFAX achieves a -6.62% return, which is significantly lower than QAI's 0.16% return. Over the past 10 years, ALFAX has underperformed QAI with an annualized return of -2.07%, while QAI has yielded a comparatively higher 1.99% annualized return.


ALFAX

YTD

-6.62%

1M

15.75%

6M

-12.21%

1Y

-0.43%

5Y*

5.87%

10Y*

-2.07%

QAI

YTD

0.16%

1M

5.71%

6M

-0.71%

1Y

4.41%

5Y*

3.47%

10Y*

1.99%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ALFAX vs. QAI - Expense Ratio Comparison

ALFAX has a 1.40% expense ratio, which is higher than QAI's 0.79% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

ALFAX vs. QAI — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ALFAX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ALFAX is 2020
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ALFAX is 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ALFAX is 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ALFAX is 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ALFAX is 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ALFAX is 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

QAI
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of QAI is 6363
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of QAI is 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of QAI is 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of QAI is 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of QAI is 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of QAI is 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

ALFAX vs. QAI - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Alpha Strategy Fund (ALFAX) and IQ Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF (QAI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current ALFAX Sharpe Ratio is -0.02, which is lower than the QAI Sharpe Ratio of 0.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ALFAX and QAI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.501.001.502.002.50December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-0.02
0.61
ALFAX
QAI

Dividends

ALFAX vs. QAI - Dividend Comparison

ALFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, less than QAI's 2.22% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
ALFAX
Lord Abbett Alpha Strategy Fund
0.11%0.10%0.08%0.36%1.45%1.38%0.00%1.27%0.00%0.00%0.73%1.63%
QAI
IQ Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF
2.22%2.22%4.08%2.00%0.28%1.98%1.91%1.90%0.00%0.00%0.48%1.34%

Drawdowns

ALFAX vs. QAI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ALFAX drawdown since its inception was -62.76%, which is greater than QAI's maximum drawdown of -14.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALFAX and QAI. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-35.00%-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-23.52%
-2.51%
ALFAX
QAI

Volatility

ALFAX vs. QAI - Volatility Comparison

Lord Abbett Alpha Strategy Fund (ALFAX) has a higher volatility of 9.72% compared to IQ Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF (QAI) at 3.76%. This indicates that ALFAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QAI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
9.72%
3.76%
ALFAX
QAI