NEA vs. DLY
NEA (Nuveen AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund) is a stock, while DLY (DoubleLine Yield Opportunities Fund) is Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by DoubleLine. Over the past 5 years, NEA returned -0.37%/yr vs 1.85%/yr for DLY. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NEA charges 1.41%/yr vs 2.91%/yr for DLY.
Performance
NEA vs. DLY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NEA achieves a 1.11% return, which is significantly higher than DLY's -1.24% return.
NEA
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- -1.31%
- YTD
- 1.11%
- 6M
- 1.88%
- 1Y
- 13.65%
- 3Y*
- 8.73%
- 5Y*
- -0.37%
- 10Y*
- 2.81%
DLY
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- -2.35%
- YTD
- -1.24%
- 6M
- -0.58%
- 1Y
- -3.01%
- 3Y*
- 8.31%
- 5Y*
- 1.85%
- 10Y*
- —
NEA vs. DLY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NEA Nuveen AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund | 1.11% | 11.31% | 9.50% | 0.75% | -23.32% | 8.16% | 5.88% |
DLY DoubleLine Yield Opportunities Fund | -1.24% | 0.63% | 16.29% | 25.48% | -23.08% | 8.56% | -3.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between NEA and DLY is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2020 | 0.30 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NEA vs. DLY — Risk / Return Rank
NEA
DLY
NEA vs. DLY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund (NEA) and DoubleLine Yield Opportunities Fund (DLY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NEA | DLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 0.94 | +0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.88 | -0.35 | +2.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.51 | -0.88 | +8.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NEA | DLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.29 | -0.37 | +1.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.03 | 0.14 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.24 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.17 | +0.14 |
Drawdowns
NEA vs. DLY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NEA drawdown since its inception was -43.83%, which is greater than DLY's maximum drawdown of -28.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEA and DLY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NEA | DLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.83% | -28.61% | -15.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.27% | -8.74% | +1.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.16% | -10.81% | -4.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.57% | -28.61% | -7.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.57% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.99% | -5.31% | -0.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.01% | -7.82% | -0.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.82% | 3.44% | -1.62% |
Volatility
NEA vs. DLY - Volatility Comparison
Nuveen AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund (NEA) has a higher volatility of 2.94% compared to DoubleLine Yield Opportunities Fund (DLY) at 1.94%. This indicates that NEA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DLY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NEA | DLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.94% | 1.94% | +1.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.53% | 6.87% | +1.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.65% | 8.12% | +2.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.49% | 13.57% | -2.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.81% | 15.04% | -3.23% |
NEA vs. DLY - Expense Ratio Comparison
NEA has a 1.41% expense ratio, which is lower than DLY's 2.91% expense ratio.
Dividends
NEA vs. DLY - Dividend Comparison
NEA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.28%, less than DLY's 10.16% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DLY DoubleLine Yield Opportunities Fund | 10.16% | 9.63% | 8.85% | 9.84% | 10.67% | 7.49% | 5.67% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NEA Nuveen AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund | 7.28% | 7.36% | 6.63% | 3.95% | 5.49% | 4.50% | 4.45% | 4.46% | 5.40% | 5.33% | 5.70% | 5.71% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NEA and DLY have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NEA has higher volatility (2.94%) compared to DLY (1.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NEA dropped -43.83% vs DLY's -28.61%.
NEA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.29 vs -0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NEA and DLY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer