DLY vs. CEFS

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about DoubleLine Yield Opportunities Fund (DLY) and Saba Closed-End Funds ETF (CEFS).

DLY is an actively managed fund by DoubleLine. It was launched on Feb 26, 2020. CEFS is an actively managed fund by Exchange Traded Concepts. It was launched on Mar 21, 2017.

Performance

DLY vs. CEFS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DoubleLine Yield Opportunities Fund (DLY) and Saba Closed-End Funds ETF (CEFS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

DLY vs. CEFS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
DLY DoubleLine Yield Opportunities Fund	-1.94%	0.63%	16.29%	25.48%	-23.08%	8.56%	-3.06%
CEFS Saba Closed-End Funds ETF	-0.33%	16.67%	23.48%	20.99%	-7.08%	17.86%	2.80%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DLY achieves a -1.94% return, which is significantly lower than CEFS's -0.33% return.

DLY

• 1D: 3.03%
• 1M: -4.39%
• YTD: -1.94%
• 6M: -3.16%
• 1Y: -5.06%
• 3Y*: 9.63%
• 5Y*: 2.50%
• 10Y*: —

CEFS

• 1D: 2.04%
• 1M: -2.99%
• YTD: -0.33%
• 6M: 3.31%
• 1Y: 14.56%
• 3Y*: 17.06%
• 5Y*: 11.58%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DLY vs. CEFS - Expense Ratio Comparison

DLY has a 2.91% expense ratio, which is lower than CEFS's 3.80% expense ratio.

CEFS

Saba Closed-End Funds ETF

DLY

DoubleLine Yield Opportunities Fund

Return for Risk

DLY vs. CEFS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DLY

DLY Risk / Return Rank: 2
DLY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
DLY Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
DLY Omega Ratio Rank: 2
DLY Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
DLY Martin Ratio Rank: 2

CEFS

CEFS Risk / Return Rank: 66
CEFS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
CEFS Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
CEFS Omega Ratio Rank: 70
CEFS Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
CEFS Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DLY vs. CEFS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DoubleLine Yield Opportunities Fund (DLY) and Saba Closed-End Funds ETF (CEFS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DLY	CEFS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.42	1.11	-1.53
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.45	1.54	-1.99
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.92	1.25	-0.33
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.48	1.43	-1.91
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.31	6.94	-8.26
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DLY vs. CEFS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DLY Sharpe Ratio is -0.42, which is lower than the CEFS Sharpe Ratio of 1.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DLY and CEFS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DLY	CEFS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.42	1.11	-1.53
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.19	0.90	-0.71
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.17	0.70	-0.53

Correlation

The correlation between DLY and CEFS is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

DLY vs. CEFS - Dividend Comparison

DLY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.06%, more than CEFS's 8.01% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DLY DoubleLine Yield Opportunities Fund	10.06%	9.63%	8.85%	9.84%	10.67%	7.49%	5.67%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
CEFS Saba Closed-End Funds ETF	8.01%	7.84%	8.79%	9.20%	11.32%	10.73%	8.61%	8.10%	10.43%	5.02%

Drawdowns

DLY vs. CEFS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DLY drawdown since its inception was -28.61%, smaller than the maximum CEFS drawdown of -38.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DLY and CEFS.

Drawdown Indicators

	DLY	CEFS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.61%	-38.99%	+10.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.30%	-9.80%	-0.50%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.61%	-16.85%	-11.76%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.98%	-3.75%	-2.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.94%	-3.73%	-4.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.77%	2.02%	+1.75%

Volatility

DLY vs. CEFS - Volatility Comparison

DoubleLine Yield Opportunities Fund (DLY) has a higher volatility of 5.18% compared to Saba Closed-End Funds ETF (CEFS) at 4.75%. This indicates that DLY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CEFS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DLY	CEFS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.18%	4.75%	+0.43%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.47%	7.46%	-0.99%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.22%	13.15%	-0.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.54%	12.99%	+0.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.19%	15.38%	-0.19%