PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NEA vs. AMLP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NEA vs. AMLP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund (NEA) and Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NEA achieves a 1.41% return, which is significantly lower than AMLP's 20.23% return. Over the past 10 years, NEA has underperformed AMLP with an annualized return of 2.57%, while AMLP has yielded a comparatively higher 6.91% annualized return.


NEA

1D
0.00%
1M
-2.85%
6M
0.57%
YTD
1.41%
1Y
11.14%
3Y*
9.25%
5Y*
-0.97%
10Y*
2.57%
ALL TIME*
4.49%

AMLP

1D
-1.16%
1M
4.70%
6M
11.68%
YTD
20.23%
1Y
19.62%
3Y*
19.15%
5Y*
20.05%
10Y*
6.91%
ALL TIME*
5.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$73.87M$62.93M$74.06M
$8.83M$8.83M$8.71M

NEA vs. AMLP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NEA
Nuveen AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund
1.41%11.31%9.50%0.75%-23.32%8.16%10.07%22.42%-5.72%8.77%
AMLP
Alerian MLP ETF
20.23%5.78%22.76%21.40%25.47%39.09%-32.26%5.99%-12.67%-7.89%

Correlation

The correlation between NEA and AMLP is -0.04, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.13

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2010

0.09

The correlation between NEA and AMLP shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.13 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NEA vs. AMLP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NEA
NEA Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
NEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
NEA Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
NEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
NEA Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

AMLP
AMLP Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
AMLP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMLP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMLP Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
AMLP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMLP Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NEA vs. AMLP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund (NEA) and Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NEAAMLPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.27

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.54

2.39

-0.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.81

6.69

-0.88

NEA vs. AMLP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NEA Sharpe Ratio is 1.04, which is lower than the AMLP Sharpe Ratio of 1.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NEA and AMLP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NEA vs. AMLP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NEA drawdown since its inception was -43.83%, smaller than the maximum AMLP drawdown of -77.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEA and AMLP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NEAAMLPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.83%

-77.19%

+33.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.27%

-8.25%

+0.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.45%

-14.27%

+1.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.57%

-20.92%

-15.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.57%

-72.62%

+36.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.71%

-1.74%

-3.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.99%

-17.25%

+9.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.92%

2.94%

-1.02%

Volatility

NEA vs. AMLP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nuveen AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund (NEA) is 2.06%, while Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP) has a volatility of 3.90%. This indicates that NEA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMLP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NEAAMLPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.06%

3.90%

-1.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.76%

9.73%

-0.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.76%

12.53%

-1.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.52%

19.34%

-7.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.80%

27.65%

-15.85%

NEA vs. AMLP - Expense Ratio Comparison

NEA has a 1.41% expense ratio, which is higher than AMLP's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

NEA vs. AMLP - Dividend Comparison

NEA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.25%, less than AMLP's 7.40% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMLP
Alerian MLP ETF
7.40%8.36%7.70%7.86%7.70%8.55%12.31%9.12%9.29%7.97%8.09%9.84%
NEA
Nuveen AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund
7.25%7.36%6.63%3.95%5.49%4.50%4.45%4.46%5.40%5.33%5.70%5.71%

Frequently Asked Questions


NEA and AMLP have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMLP has higher volatility (3.90%) compared to NEA (2.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NEA dropped -43.83% vs AMLP's -77.19%.

AMLP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs 1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NEA and AMLP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer