PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NDQ.AX vs. VGT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NDQ.AX vs. VGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a A$10,000 investment in BetaShares NASDAQ 100 ETF (NDQ.AX) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

NDQ.AX is traded in AUD, while VGT is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the VGT values have been converted to AUD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NDQ.AX achieves a 12.48% return, which is significantly lower than VGT's 22.49% return. Over the past 10 years, NDQ.AX has underperformed VGT with an annualized return of 21.80%, while VGT has yielded a comparatively higher 26.07% annualized return.


NDQ.AX

1D
-0.22%
1M
10.02%
YTD
12.48%
6M
10.31%
1Y
28.25%
3Y*
25.30%
5Y*
19.70%
10Y*
21.80%

VGT

1D
-0.59%
1M
16.20%
YTD
22.49%
6M
19.72%
1Y
44.52%
3Y*
30.18%
5Y*
24.12%
10Y*
26.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NDQ.AX vs. VGT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NDQ.AX
BetaShares NASDAQ 100 ETF
12.48%12.19%38.30%53.41%-28.42%35.46%34.50%39.66%9.14%21.89%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
22.49%12.93%42.32%52.77%-25.05%38.10%33.22%49.31%13.44%26.64%

Correlation

The correlation between NDQ.AX and VGT is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2015

0.10

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NDQ.AX vs. VGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NDQ.AX
NDQ.AX Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
NDQ.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NDQ.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
NDQ.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
NDQ.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
NDQ.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

VGT
VGT Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
VGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGT Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
VGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGT Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NDQ.AX vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BetaShares NASDAQ 100 ETF (NDQ.AX) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NDQ.AXVGTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.42

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.85

2.26

-0.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.77

5.77

-0.99

NDQ.AX vs. VGT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NDQ.AX Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is comparable to the VGT Sharpe Ratio of 2.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NDQ.AX and VGT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NDQ.AXVGTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.99

2.49

-0.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.03

1.08

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.13

1.16

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.06

0.88

+0.18

Drawdowns

NDQ.AX vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NDQ.AX drawdown since its inception was -30.79%, smaller than the maximum VGT drawdown of -34.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NDQ.AX and VGT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NDQ.AXVGTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.79%

-34.74%

+3.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.17%

-19.76%

+4.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.27%

-26.02%

+4.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.79%

-30.26%

-0.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.79%

-30.26%

-0.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.22%

-1.36%

+1.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.87%

-8.08%

+2.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.89%

7.74%

-1.85%

Volatility

NDQ.AX vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BetaShares NASDAQ 100 ETF (NDQ.AX) is 2.85%, while Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) has a volatility of 5.21%. This indicates that NDQ.AX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NDQ.AXVGTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.85%

5.21%

-2.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.27%

14.00%

-3.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.07%

17.96%

-3.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.11%

22.37%

-3.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.14%

22.59%

-3.45%

NDQ.AX vs. VGT - Expense Ratio Comparison

NDQ.AX has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than VGT's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

NDQ.AX vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison

NDQ.AX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.44%, more than VGT's 0.31% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NDQ.AX
BetaShares NASDAQ 100 ETF
1.44%1.67%1.86%2.17%3.36%3.33%2.47%2.22%0.52%0.45%0.43%0.00%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
0.31%0.40%0.60%0.65%0.91%0.64%0.82%1.11%1.29%0.99%1.31%1.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


NDQ.AX and VGT have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VGT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VGT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for NDQ.AX.

NDQ.AX is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while VGT is Technology Equities. NDQ.AX tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while VGT tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: BetaShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for NDQ.AX and 0.09% for VGT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NDQ.AX and VGT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer