PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NDQ.AX vs. SCHG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NDQ.AX vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a A$10,000 investment in BetaShares NASDAQ 100 ETF (NDQ.AX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

NDQ.AX is traded in AUD, while SCHG is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SCHG values have been converted to AUD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NDQ.AX achieves a 12.73% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's -0.39% return. Over the past 10 years, NDQ.AX has outperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 21.60%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively lower 19.16% annualized return.


NDQ.AX

1D
0.77%
1M
11.02%
YTD
12.73%
6M
9.86%
1Y
30.02%
3Y*
25.55%
5Y*
19.76%
10Y*
21.60%

SCHG

1D
-0.77%
1M
5.37%
YTD
-0.39%
6M
-2.03%
1Y
13.04%
3Y*
21.88%
5Y*
17.52%
10Y*
19.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NDQ.AX vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NDQ.AX
BetaShares NASDAQ 100 ETF
12.73%12.19%38.30%53.41%-28.42%35.46%34.50%39.66%9.14%21.89%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
-0.39%8.97%48.53%50.21%-27.29%35.63%26.92%36.65%9.22%18.29%

Correlation

The correlation between NDQ.AX and SCHG is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2015

0.11

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NDQ.AX vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NDQ.AX
NDQ.AX Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
NDQ.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NDQ.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
NDQ.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
NDQ.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
NDQ.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHG
SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NDQ.AX vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BetaShares NASDAQ 100 ETF (NDQ.AX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NDQ.AXSCHGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.18

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.96

0.66

+1.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.07

1.61

+3.46

NDQ.AX vs. SCHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NDQ.AX Sharpe Ratio is 2.11, which is higher than the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 0.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NDQ.AX and SCHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NDQ.AXSCHGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.11

0.97

+1.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.03

0.89

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.12

0.98

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.06

1.04

+0.02

Drawdowns

NDQ.AX vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NDQ.AX drawdown since its inception was -30.79%, roughly equal to the maximum SCHG drawdown of -31.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NDQ.AX and SCHG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NDQ.AXSCHGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.79%

-31.20%

+0.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.17%

-19.81%

+4.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.27%

-22.66%

+1.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.79%

-31.20%

+0.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.79%

-31.20%

+0.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-4.94%

+4.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.87%

-5.15%

-0.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.89%

8.11%

-2.22%

Volatility

NDQ.AX vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

BetaShares NASDAQ 100 ETF (NDQ.AX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) have volatilities of 2.77% and 2.84%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NDQ.AXSCHGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.77%

2.84%

-0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.28%

9.98%

+0.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.11%

13.54%

+0.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.11%

19.74%

-0.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.14%

19.66%

-0.52%

NDQ.AX vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

NDQ.AX has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

NDQ.AX vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

NDQ.AX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.43%, more than SCHG's 0.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NDQ.AX
BetaShares NASDAQ 100 ETF
1.43%1.67%1.86%2.17%3.36%3.33%2.47%2.22%0.52%0.45%0.43%0.00%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
0.36%0.36%0.39%0.46%0.55%0.42%0.52%0.82%1.27%1.01%1.04%1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


NDQ.AX and SCHG have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SCHG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for NDQ.AX.

NDQ.AX is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while SCHG is Large Cap Growth Equities. NDQ.AX tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while SCHG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: BetaShares and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for NDQ.AX and 0.04% for SCHG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NDQ.AX and SCHG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer