NDQ.AX vs. SCHG
NDQ.AX (BetaShares NASDAQ 100 ETF) and SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NDQ.AX is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, while SCHG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, NDQ.AX returned 21.60%/yr vs 19.16%/yr for SCHG. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NDQ.AX charges 0.48%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHG.
Performance
NDQ.AX vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
NDQ.AX is traded in AUD, while SCHG is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SCHG values have been converted to AUD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NDQ.AX achieves a 12.73% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's -0.39% return. Over the past 10 years, NDQ.AX has outperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 21.60%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively lower 19.16% annualized return.
NDQ.AX
- 1D
- 0.77%
- 1M
- 11.02%
- YTD
- 12.73%
- 6M
- 9.86%
- 1Y
- 30.02%
- 3Y*
- 25.55%
- 5Y*
- 19.76%
- 10Y*
- 21.60%
SCHG
- 1D
- -0.77%
- 1M
- 5.37%
- YTD
- -0.39%
- 6M
- -2.03%
- 1Y
- 13.04%
- 3Y*
- 21.88%
- 5Y*
- 17.52%
- 10Y*
- 19.16%
NDQ.AX vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NDQ.AX BetaShares NASDAQ 100 ETF | 12.73% | 12.19% | 38.30% | 53.41% | -28.42% | 35.46% | 34.50% | 39.66% | 9.14% | 21.89% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | -0.39% | 8.97% | 48.53% | 50.21% | -27.29% | 35.63% | 26.92% | 36.65% | 9.22% | 18.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between NDQ.AX and SCHG is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2015 | 0.11 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NDQ.AX vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank
NDQ.AX
SCHG
NDQ.AX vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BetaShares NASDAQ 100 ETF (NDQ.AX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NDQ.AX | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.18 | +0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.96 | 0.66 | +1.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.07 | 1.61 | +3.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NDQ.AX | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.11 | 0.97 | +1.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.03 | 0.89 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.12 | 0.98 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.06 | 1.04 | +0.02 |
Drawdowns
NDQ.AX vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NDQ.AX drawdown since its inception was -30.79%, roughly equal to the maximum SCHG drawdown of -31.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NDQ.AX and SCHG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NDQ.AX | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.79% | -31.20% | +0.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.17% | -19.81% | +4.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.27% | -22.66% | +1.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.79% | -31.20% | +0.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.79% | -31.20% | +0.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -4.94% | +4.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.87% | -5.15% | -0.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.89% | 8.11% | -2.22% |
Volatility
NDQ.AX vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison
BetaShares NASDAQ 100 ETF (NDQ.AX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) have volatilities of 2.77% and 2.84%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NDQ.AX | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.77% | 2.84% | -0.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.28% | 9.98% | +0.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.11% | 13.54% | +0.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.11% | 19.74% | -0.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.14% | 19.66% | -0.52% |
NDQ.AX vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison
NDQ.AX has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
NDQ.AX vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison
NDQ.AX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.43%, more than SCHG's 0.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NDQ.AX BetaShares NASDAQ 100 ETF | 1.43% | 1.67% | 1.86% | 2.17% | 3.36% | 3.33% | 2.47% | 2.22% | 0.52% | 0.45% | 0.43% | 0.00% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.36% | 0.36% | 0.39% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NDQ.AX and SCHG have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SCHG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for NDQ.AX.
NDQ.AX is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while SCHG is Large Cap Growth Equities. NDQ.AX tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while SCHG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: BetaShares and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for NDQ.AX and 0.04% for SCHG.
Find the right allocation for NDQ.AX and SCHG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer