NDQ.AX vs. SCHG
Compare and contrast key facts about BetaShares NASDAQ 100 ETF (NDQ.AX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG).
NDQ.AX and SCHG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. NDQ.AX is a passively managed fund by BetaShares that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Jul 20, 2020. SCHG is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Total Return Index. It was launched on Dec 11, 2009. Both NDQ.AX and SCHG are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: NDQ.AX or SCHG.
Correlation
The correlation between NDQ.AX and SCHG is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
NDQ.AX vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
NDQ.AX:
0.38
SCHG:
0.55
NDQ.AX:
0.69
SCHG:
0.92
NDQ.AX:
1.09
SCHG:
1.13
NDQ.AX:
0.41
SCHG:
0.58
NDQ.AX:
1.48
SCHG:
2.06
NDQ.AX:
5.90%
SCHG:
6.62%
NDQ.AX:
22.89%
SCHG:
25.04%
NDQ.AX:
-30.79%
SCHG:
-34.59%
NDQ.AX:
-16.27%
SCHG:
-13.04%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NDQ.AX achieves a -14.14% return, which is significantly lower than SCHG's -9.20% return.
NDQ.AX
-14.14%
-8.95%
-4.00%
8.60%
16.97%
N/A
SCHG
-9.20%
-2.17%
-4.69%
14.30%
18.55%
14.92%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NDQ.AX vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison
NDQ.AX has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
NDQ.AX vs. SCHG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
NDQ.AX
SCHG
NDQ.AX vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BetaShares NASDAQ 100 ETF (NDQ.AX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
NDQ.AX vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison
NDQ.AX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.17%, more than SCHG's 0.45% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NDQ.AX BetaShares NASDAQ 100 ETF | 2.17% | 1.86% | 2.17% | 3.36% | 3.33% | 2.47% | 2.22% | 0.52% | 0.45% | 0.43% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.45% | 0.39% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% | 1.09% |
Drawdowns
NDQ.AX vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NDQ.AX drawdown since its inception was -30.79%, smaller than the maximum SCHG drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NDQ.AX and SCHG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
NDQ.AX vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison
BetaShares NASDAQ 100 ETF (NDQ.AX) has a higher volatility of 17.92% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) at 16.60%. This indicates that NDQ.AX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.