NDQ.AX vs. QQQI
NDQ.AX (BetaShares NASDAQ 100 ETF) and QQQI (NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF) are both Nasdaq-100 funds. NDQ.AX is passively managed, while QQQI is actively managed. Over the past year, NDQ.AX returned 28.25% vs 18.38% for QQQI. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NDQ.AX charges 0.48%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for QQQI.
Performance
NDQ.AX vs. QQQI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
NDQ.AX is traded in AUD, while QQQI is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the QQQI values have been converted to AUD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NDQ.AX achieves a 12.48% return, which is significantly higher than QQQI's 6.11% return.
NDQ.AX
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 10.02%
- YTD
- 12.48%
- 6M
- 10.31%
- 1Y
- 28.25%
- 3Y*
- 25.30%
- 5Y*
- 19.70%
- 10Y*
- 21.80%
QQQI
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 6.71%
- YTD
- 6.11%
- 6M
- 4.67%
- 1Y
- 18.38%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NDQ.AX vs. QQQI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
NDQ.AX BetaShares NASDAQ 100 ETF | 12.48% | 12.19% | 28.36% |
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF | 6.11% | 10.01% | 27.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between NDQ.AX and QQQI is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2024 | 0.12 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NDQ.AX vs. QQQI — Risk / Return Rank
NDQ.AX
QQQI
NDQ.AX vs. QQQI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BetaShares NASDAQ 100 ETF (NDQ.AX) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NDQ.AX | QQQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.30 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.85 | 1.47 | +0.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.77 | 3.95 | +0.82 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NDQ.AX | QQQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.99 | 1.64 | +0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.03 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.13 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.06 | 1.21 | -0.14 |
Drawdowns
NDQ.AX vs. QQQI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NDQ.AX drawdown since its inception was -30.79%, which is greater than QQQI's maximum drawdown of -17.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NDQ.AX and QQQI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NDQ.AX | QQQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.79% | -17.58% | -13.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.17% | -12.53% | -2.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.27% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.79% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.79% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.22% | -0.06% | -0.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.87% | -3.08% | -2.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.89% | 4.66% | +1.23% |
Volatility
NDQ.AX vs. QQQI - Volatility Comparison
BetaShares NASDAQ 100 ETF (NDQ.AX) has a higher volatility of 2.85% compared to NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) at 1.62%. This indicates that NDQ.AX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NDQ.AX | QQQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.85% | 1.62% | +1.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.27% | 8.33% | +1.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.07% | 11.24% | +2.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.11% | 15.52% | +3.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.14% | 15.52% | +3.62% |
NDQ.AX vs. QQQI - Expense Ratio Comparison
NDQ.AX has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQI's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
NDQ.AX vs. QQQI - Dividend Comparison
NDQ.AX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.44%, less than QQQI's 13.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NDQ.AX BetaShares NASDAQ 100 ETF | 1.44% | 1.67% | 1.86% | 2.17% | 3.36% | 3.33% | 2.47% | 2.22% | 0.52% | 0.45% | 0.43% |
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF | 13.24% | 13.82% | 12.85% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NDQ.AX and QQQI have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NDQ.AX is cheaper at 0.48% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NDQ.AX is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for QQQI.
They also come from different issuers: BetaShares and Neos. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for NDQ.AX and 0.68% for QQQI.
Find the right allocation for NDQ.AX and QQQI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer