NDOW vs. CSHP

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

NDOW (Anydrus Advantage ETF) and CSHP (iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NDOW is a Global Allocation fund actively managed by Anydrus Capital, while CSHP is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by iShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, NDOW returned 19.79% vs 3.96% for CSHP. At a correlation of -0.00, they often move in opposite directions. NDOW charges 2.15%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for CSHP.

Performance

NDOW vs. CSHP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Anydrus Advantage ETF (NDOW) and iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NDOW achieves a 8.31% return, which is significantly higher than CSHP's 1.63% return.

NDOW

• 1D: -0.62%
• 1M: 3.61%
• YTD: 8.31%
• 6M: 9.39%
• 1Y: 19.79%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CSHP

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.27%
• YTD: 1.63%
• 6M: 1.93%
• 1Y: 3.96%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NDOW vs. CSHP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
NDOW Anydrus Advantage ETF	8.31%	14.80%	-2.20%
CSHP iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF	1.63%	4.10%	2.24%

Correlation

The correlation between NDOW and CSHP is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.15
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 2024	-0.00

The correlation between NDOW and CSHP shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (1 year) to -0.00 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

NDOW vs. CSHP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NDOW

NDOW Risk / Return Rank: 65
NDOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
NDOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
NDOW Omega Ratio Rank: 69
NDOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
NDOW Martin Ratio Rank: 65

CSHP

CSHP Risk / Return Rank: 100
CSHP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
CSHP Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
CSHP Omega Ratio Rank: 100
CSHP Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
CSHP Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NDOW vs. CSHP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Anydrus Advantage ETF (NDOW) and iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NDOW	CSHP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.22	11.91	-9.69
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.11	31.26	-28.14
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	7.44	-6.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.77	65.71	-62.94
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.62	432.16	-420.54
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NDOW vs. CSHP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NDOW Sharpe Ratio is 2.22, which is lower than the CSHP Sharpe Ratio of 11.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NDOW and CSHP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NDOW	CSHP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.22	11.91	-9.69
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.16	10.75	-9.59

Drawdowns

NDOW vs. CSHP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NDOW drawdown since its inception was -8.76%, which is greater than CSHP's maximum drawdown of -0.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NDOW and CSHP.

Drawdown Indicators

	NDOW	CSHP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.76%	-0.08%	-8.68%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.17%	-0.06%	-7.11%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.62%	0.00%	-0.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.39%	-0.00%	-1.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.71%	0.01%	+1.70%

Volatility

NDOW vs. CSHP - Volatility Comparison

Anydrus Advantage ETF (NDOW) has a higher volatility of 3.53% compared to iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP) at 0.07%. This indicates that NDOW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSHP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NDOW	CSHP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.53%	0.07%	+3.46%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.49%	0.24%	+7.25%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.96%	0.33%	+8.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.84%	0.40%	+8.44%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.84%	0.40%	+8.44%

NDOW vs. CSHP - Expense Ratio Comparison

NDOW has a 2.15% expense ratio, which is higher than CSHP's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

NDOW vs. CSHP - Dividend Comparison

NDOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.14%, less than CSHP's 3.92% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
CSHP iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF	3.92%	5.39%	1.96%
NDOW Anydrus Advantage ETF	1.14%	1.24%	1.39%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NDOW and CSHP in my portfolio?

NDOW and CSHP have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NDOW or CSHP?

NDOW has higher volatility (3.53%) compared to CSHP (0.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NDOW dropped -8.76% vs CSHP's -0.08%.

Which ETF is better, NDOW or CSHP?

On 1-year performance, NDOW leads with 19.79% vs 3.96% for CSHP. On fees, CSHP is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, CSHP has been the lower-risk option at 0.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NDOW or CSHP?

Over the 1-year period, NDOW has performed better with a 19.79% return vs 3.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NDOW or CSHP?

CSHP is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 2.15% for NDOW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NDOW or CSHP?

CSHP has the higher dividend yield at 3.92%, compared with 1.14% for NDOW.

What is the main difference between NDOW and CSHP?

NDOW is categorized as Global Allocation, while CSHP is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Anydrus Capital and iShares. Their fees differ too: 2.15% for NDOW and 0.20% for CSHP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CSHP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (11.91 vs 2.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.