CSHP vs. BILS
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP) and SPDR Bloomberg 3-12 Month T-Bill ETF (BILS).
CSHP and BILS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CSHP is an actively managed fund by iShares. It was launched on Jul 17, 2024. BILS is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg 3-12 Month U.S. Treasury Bill Index. It was launched on Sep 24, 2020.
Performance
CSHP vs. BILS - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CSHP vs. BILS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
CSHP iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF | 0.98% | 4.10% | 2.24% |
BILS SPDR Bloomberg 3-12 Month T-Bill ETF | 0.80% | 4.23% | 2.35% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSHP achieves a 0.98% return, which is significantly higher than BILS's 0.80% return.
CSHP
- 1D
- -0.00%
- 1M
- 0.39%
- YTD
- 0.98%
- 6M
- 1.98%
- 1Y
- 4.11%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BILS
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.26%
- YTD
- 0.80%
- 6M
- 1.82%
- 1Y
- 3.99%
- 3Y*
- 4.67%
- 5Y*
- 3.17%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CSHP vs. BILS - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSHP has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than BILS's 0.14% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
CSHP vs. BILS — Risk / Return Rank
CSHP
BILS
CSHP vs. BILS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP) and SPDR Bloomberg 3-12 Month T-Bill ETF (BILS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CSHP | BILS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 10.92 | 16.39 | -5.47 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 27.40 | 75.13 | -47.73 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 6.43 | 26.69 | -20.27 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 58.55 | 132.67 | -74.12 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 348.21 | 1,118.82 | -770.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CSHP | BILS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.92 | 16.39 | -5.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 10.37 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 10.59 | 9.65 | +0.94 |
Correlation
The correlation between CSHP and BILS is 0.18, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
CSHP vs. BILS - Dividend Comparison
CSHP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.19%, more than BILS's 3.96% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSHP iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF | 5.19% | 5.39% | 1.96% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BILS SPDR Bloomberg 3-12 Month T-Bill ETF | 3.96% | 4.08% | 5.01% | 4.98% | 1.61% |
Drawdowns
CSHP vs. BILS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSHP drawdown since its inception was -0.08%, smaller than the maximum BILS drawdown of -0.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSHP and BILS.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSHP | BILS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.08% | -0.41% | +0.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.07% | -0.03% | -0.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -0.40% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -0.04% | +0.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.01% | 0.00% | +0.01% |
Volatility
CSHP vs. BILS - Volatility Comparison
iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP) has a higher volatility of 0.15% compared to SPDR Bloomberg 3-12 Month T-Bill ETF (BILS) at 0.05%. This indicates that CSHP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BILS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CSHP | BILS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.15% | 0.05% | +0.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.26% | 0.15% | +0.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38% | 0.24% | +0.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.41% | 0.31% | +0.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.41% | 0.30% | +0.11% |