CSHP vs. BILS

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CSHP (iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF) and BILS (SPDR Bloomberg 3-12 Month T-Bill ETF) are both Ultrashort Bond funds. CSHP is actively managed, while BILS is passively managed. Over the past year, CSHP returned 3.96% vs 3.90% for BILS. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CSHP charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for BILS.

Performance

CSHP vs. BILS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP) and SPDR Bloomberg 3-12 Month T-Bill ETF (BILS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSHP achieves a 1.63% return, which is significantly higher than BILS's 1.40% return.

CSHP

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.27%
• YTD: 1.63%
• 6M: 1.93%
• 1Y: 3.96%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BILS

• 1D: -0.01%
• 1M: 0.28%
• YTD: 1.40%
• 6M: 1.73%
• 1Y: 3.90%
• 3Y*: 4.66%
• 5Y*: 3.29%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSHP vs. BILS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
CSHP iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF	1.63%	4.10%	2.24%
BILS SPDR Bloomberg 3-12 Month T-Bill ETF	1.40%	4.23%	2.35%

Correlation

The correlation between CSHP and BILS is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.19
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 2024	0.19

Return for Risk

CSHP vs. BILS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSHP

CSHP Risk / Return Rank: 100
CSHP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
CSHP Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
CSHP Omega Ratio Rank: 100
CSHP Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
CSHP Martin Ratio Rank: 100

BILS

BILS Risk / Return Rank: 100
BILS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
BILS Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
BILS Omega Ratio Rank: 100
BILS Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
BILS Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSHP vs. BILS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP) and SPDR Bloomberg 3-12 Month T-Bill ETF (BILS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CSHP	BILS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	11.91	16.80	-4.89
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	31.26	100.82	-69.57
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	7.44	42.08	-34.64
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	65.71	129.91	-64.20
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	432.16	1,442.41	-1,010.25
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CSHP vs. BILS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSHP Sharpe Ratio is 11.91, which is comparable to the BILS Sharpe Ratio of 16.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSHP and BILS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CSHP	BILS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.91	16.80	-4.89
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	10.79	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	10.75	9.79	+0.96

Drawdowns

CSHP vs. BILS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSHP drawdown since its inception was -0.08%, smaller than the maximum BILS drawdown of -0.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSHP and BILS.

Drawdown Indicators

	CSHP	BILS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.08%	-0.41%	+0.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.06%	-0.03%	-0.03%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-0.04%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-0.38%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.01%	+0.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.00%	-0.04%	+0.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.01%	0.00%	+0.01%

Volatility

CSHP vs. BILS - Volatility Comparison

iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP) has a higher volatility of 0.07% compared to SPDR Bloomberg 3-12 Month T-Bill ETF (BILS) at 0.06%. This indicates that CSHP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BILS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CSHP	BILS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.07%	0.06%	+0.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.24%	0.14%	+0.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.33%	0.23%	+0.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.40%	0.31%	+0.09%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.40%	0.30%	+0.10%

CSHP vs. BILS - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSHP has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than BILS's 0.14% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

CSHP vs. BILS - Dividend Comparison

CSHP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.92%, more than BILS's 3.81% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
BILS SPDR Bloomberg 3-12 Month T-Bill ETF	3.81%	4.08%	5.01%	4.98%	1.61%
CSHP iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF	3.92%	5.39%	1.96%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CSHP and BILS in my portfolio?

CSHP and BILS have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CSHP or BILS?

CSHP has higher volatility (0.07%) compared to BILS (0.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSHP dropped -0.08% vs BILS's -0.41%.

Which ETF is better, CSHP or BILS?

On 1-year performance, CSHP leads with 3.96% vs 3.90% for BILS. On fees, BILS is cheaper at 0.14% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CSHP or BILS?

Over the 1-year period, CSHP has performed better with a 3.96% return vs 3.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CSHP or BILS?

BILS is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for CSHP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CSHP or BILS?

CSHP has the higher dividend yield at 3.92%, compared with 3.81% for BILS.

What is the main difference between CSHP and BILS?

They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for CSHP and 0.14% for BILS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BILS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (16.80 vs 11.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.